chuq@Apple.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) (03/03/90)
New Issues: o I've removed comp.sys.mac.virus from the ballot. After getting a lot of mail and having many discussions, I've been convinced that this is an issue that has to be dealt with separately from the rest of the proposal. While there has been a fair amount of support for c.s.m.virus (in fact, significantly more than any other proposal added after the initial call for discussion), there is also a lot of fairly strong disagreement with it, especially from the people involved in doing anti-virus work (John Norstad, Werner Uhrig and Joel Levin all came out strongly against its existence, among others). I'd originally gotten about 12 requests requesting it be put on the ballot. Going through my archives, I find that three of those have been rescinded and I now have about as many request to not create the group. This has put me in the fascinating position of arguing something I don't want. I have always been against c.s.m.virus, since it duplicates the function of comp.virus. The bottom line is this: c.s.m.virus is a controversial issue, controversial enough that I no longer feel it should be included in a mass vote proposal, because there is no way we can successfully resolve all of the competing requirements by the time the call for votes comes out. The advantage of the mass vote is that we can take a series of proposals and deal with them all at once, but the responsibility is on us to keep those proposals fairly clearcut, since to some degree we're reducing our ability to hash out the issues involved. It's obvious that c.s.m.virus doesn't fit this requirement. So c.s.m.virus is off the ballot. I would rather err on the side of the status quo than creating the wrong groups, and comp.virus gives us a place for this material until we can decide whether or not a mac-specific group is necessary. From all of my discussions, I'm convinced it isn't, but if someone is interested, they can bring it up as a separate discussion once all this is done. Surveys under way: please make sure that you send in your responses by March 5 if you want them counted. (1) Please send me e-mail with your preferred name for what is currently comp.sys.mac.os. Rank the following by preference: c.s.m.os c.s.m.sysf c.s.m.sysfold c.s.m.system If you feel that a name is not appropriate, rank it with 'NA'. If you have no preferences, don't rank the work. Here's how I'll count this: the name ranked 1 will get 5 points, 2nd three, third two and fourth 1. Names not mentioned (no preference) will get zero. Names marked 'NA' will get minus 2 (-2). Example: a person wants sysf or system, doesn't care about os and hates sysfold. His vote would be: (1) sysf (2) system (NA) sysfold I'll use the name with the largest point total at the end. One vote per person, and the survey will continue until March 5. (2) Please send me e-mail on the appropriate name for c.s.m.wanted. Rank the following by preference: c.s.m.wanted c.s.m.help c.s.m.request same rules as the c.s.m.os survey apply. (3) [[[[cancelled]]]] (4) Should we create a comp.sys.mac.apps sub-hierarchy, or should we place things subsidiary to comp.sys.mac? (either c.s.m.apps.games, c.s.m.apps.misc, c.s.m.apps.comm for the former, or c.s.m.misc, c.s.m.games, c.s.m.comm for the latter) please vote 'apps' or 'no apps'. Survey status: Final name of c.s.m.os. [[survey ends March 5.]] 155 c.s.m.system 107 c.s.m.os -18 c.s.m.sysfold -39 c.s.m.sysf Final name of c.s.m.wanted. [[survey ends March 5.]] 131 c.s.m.wanted 94 c.s.m.request 25 c.s.m.help 12 c.s.m.questions [write-in] Whether comp.sys.mac.virus should be moderated or unmoderated. [[cancelled]] Whether there should be a comp.sys.mac.apps hierarchy. [[survey ends March 5.]] 3 comp.sys.mac.apps 8 no comp.sys.mac.apps Whether or not to allow variation from the guidelines for the 'multiple votes in a single proposal' for the reorganization: Yes, 173, no, 4. [[proposal considered passed]] Whether to use comp.sys.mac.apps or comp.sys.mac.appl: apps 22, appl 10. [[recommendation 'apps']] ---===---===---===---===---=== new changes to text of proposal. ---===---===---===---===---=== proposal 8 deleted. ---===---===---===---===---=== proposed text of call for votes proposal. (hint: you don't need to read this unless you haven't seen it before or want to check on changes noted changes, and we really aren't voting on these yet, so don't send in votes) ---===---===---===---===---=== Please vote on each proposal separately. You may vote 'yes', 'no' or 'abstain/no preference' (or whatever terms you want for these as long as they're non-ambiguous), Proposal 1: rename comp.sys.mac to comp.sys.mac.misc. This will be in multiple stages: the creation of comp.sys.mac.misc, followed a few weeks later by the rmgroup of comp.sys.mac and the addition of a usenet alias to the new group to forward misdirected messages. This will bring c.s.m into the same standardized naming as other hierarchies, and it should also discourage some of the cross-posting between c.s.m and sub-groups that happens when people think they should put it in the parent group just in case. Proposal 2: Creation of comp.sys.mac.os. This will be for discussion of Macintosh system software -- the system, finder, multifinder, CDEVs, INITs and other Apple and third party Operating System software and its extensions. Proposal 3: Creation of comp.sys.mac.apps.misc. This will be for discussion of Macintosh applications. It is designed as the beginning of a sub-hierarchy of groups, hence the creation of c.s.m.a.misc instead of c.s.m.apps. Proposal 4: renaming comp.sys.mac.hypercard to comp.sys.mac.apps.hypercard. To standardize naming in the new scheme. Proposal 5: creation of comp.sys.mac.wanted. A place for the "I'm missing part five of..." or "I need a program that does..." or "Where can I get a good price on..." messages. There was some discussion of creating a sister group c.s.m.forsale, but for sale messages really should be encouraged to go into a regional group and not a net-wide group. Proposal 6: Creation of group comp.sys.mac.apps.games. A group for the discussion of macintosh-based computer games. Proposal 7: Creation of group comp.sys.mac.apps.comm. A group for the discussion of telecommunication and networking software and programs: Red Ryder, Microphone, Appleshare, etc. Proposal 8: Deleted Proposal 9: Creation of group comp.sys.mac.announce, to be created moderated. Moderator to be appointed at some future time. Designed to be a low-volume, high-content group for distribution of information, regular postings (like the "where to find...", and "introduction to comp.sys.mac" documents, postings like virus alerts and other forms of information (product announcements? press releases?) to be determined. No changes: comp.sys.mac.programmer, comp.sys.mac.digest, comp.sys.mac.hardware -- Chuq Von Rospach <+> chuq@apple.com <+> [This is myself speaking] All spirits are enslaved which serve things evil -- Shelley