dave@uwvax.ARPA (07/19/84)
We have used tar (or a subset of tar actually, it generates tar-tapes) for incrementals since 4.1 times. The only problem with the scheme suggested is the 'find'. Find is amazingly slow! I wrote a new find program which runs through the inode list on the filesystems to be dumped (gleened from fstab), makes a bitmap of the files to be dumped and then does a fast transversal of the directory structure for the names ('sounds like dump' you say? Yes, that's where I got the idea). This takes about 10 mins when searching through 1++ gig. The differences to tar are that it reads the files it dumps from a file and can dump to remote tapedrives (only under 4.2). We also made a complementary restore program which gives the ability to restore a file to places other than where they originated. This all runs very well (except when the tapedrives die). Now if I could only get the incremental dump history to work right..... -- Dave Cohrs @ wisconsin ...!{allegra,heurikon,ihnp4,seismo,ucbvax,uwm-evax}!uwvax!dave dave@wisc-rsch.arpa