eric@diox (Eric Pouyoul) (05/17/88)
I have to connect with UUCP two systems. One is a 286 running IBM XENIX, witch have some UUCP link with other systems, like VAXs under BSD 4.3 and some *UNIX* systems. The second machine is a Motorola under a native System V.3 release 4. With this package, UUCP is the famous HDB UUCP. I have a little documentation to configure this UUCP, but, when XENIX call the Motorola, all is ok, but nothing done after the "shere= ..." message. I don't know where is the bug, in the HDB configuration or in my physical link (XENIX tty driver is not so good). I'm sure about the electrical connexion (I can use it with kermit). Did anyone make this link (XENIX <-> SystemV.3) ? Thank's Eric -- _____________________________________________________________________________ Eric Pouyoul / MICROPREST 61 Avenue de Paris 94800 VILLEJUIF UUCP : { ..seismo!mcvax!inria!diox!eric } _____________________________________________________________________________
mikes@ncoast.UUCP (Mike Squires) (05/31/88)
In article <223@diox> eric@diox (Eric Pouyoul) writes: >I have to connect with UUCP two systems. One is a 286 running >IBM XENIX, witch have some UUCP link with other systems, like VAXs under >BSD 4.3 and some *UNIX* systems. > >The second machine is a Motorola under a native System V.3 release 4. >With this package, UUCP is the famous HDB UUCP. I have a little documentation >to configure this UUCP, but, when XENIX call the Motorola, all is ok, but >nothing done after the "shere= ..." message. > This may not be the answer to your specific problem, but I have found that my Tandy 6000 under 68K XENIX 3.2 (3.0 development system) will fail in the way described (connection dropped after startup) when the first task queued is a uucp file copy. Sending a piece of mail "solves" the problem. This has occurred between the 6000 and systems that I know to be running HDB and those that I suspect to be running HDB. It appears only when the 6000 is polling the HDB system, and not vice versa. Mike Squires Allegheny College Meadville, PA 16335 814 724 3360 uucp: ..!mandrill!ncoast!{mikes,peng!sir-alan!mikes} or ..!pitt!sir-alan!mikes BITNET: mikes%sir-alan@pitt.UUCP (VAX) MIKES AT SIR-ALAN!PITT.UUCP (IBM) known in the SCA as Sir Alan Culross, Earl Marshall of the Middle Kingdon
clif@clif.UUCP (Clif Flynt) (06/04/88)
In article <7835@ncoast.UUCP> mikes@ncoast.UUCP (Mike Squires) writes: >Tandy 6000 under 68K XENIX 3.2 (3.0 development system) will fail in the way >described (connection dropped after startup) when the first task queued is a >uucp file copy. Sending a piece of mail "solves" the problem. This has occurred >between the 6000 and systems that I know to be running HDB and those that I >suspect to be running HDB. It appears only when the 6000 is polling the HDB >system, and not vice versa. > >Mike Squires Allegheny College Meadville, PA 16335 814 724 3360 >uucp: ..!mandrill!ncoast!{mikes,peng!sir-alan!mikes} or ..!pitt!sir-alan!mikes >BITNET: mikes%sir-alan@pitt.UUCP (VAX) MIKES AT SIR-ALAN!PITT.UUCP (IBM) >known in the SCA as Sir Alan Culross, Earl Marshall of the Middle Kingdon I had similar problems when I was first setting up my uport HDB system, and trying to get all my old programs off my Tandy M16. I could only transfer stuff if the HDB system initiated the transfer. When you call in to a HDB system, the stuff in the Permissions file is checked a lot more thoroughly than when you call out. (Like, I don't know if it's checked at all when a HDB system calls out.) The system you call should have a setup something like this for your system in it's Permissions file. If you don't, then you'll have trouble talking unless they call you. LOGNAME=uuname \ MACHINE=system_name \ REQUEST=yes READ=/usr/spool/uucppublic WRITE=/usr/spool/uucppublic \ COMMANDS=rmail:rnews \ SENDFILES=yes Hope this helps... -- -------------------------------- Clif Flynt -------------------------------- --------------------------- uunet!umix!clif!clif --------------------------- ---------------- This space reserved for a witty disclaimer ----------------