jl42+@andrew.cmu.edu (Jay Mathew Libove) (10/12/88)
Someone mailed to me explaining that there is a problem with the 2.2.1 SCO uux, and that I should just use my old 2.1.3 version. He's right. 2.2.1 SCO uux is busted, 2.1.3 replaces it nicely. Thanks! Jay Libove ARPA: jl42@andrew.cmu.edu, libove@cs.cmu.edu 5731 Centre Avenue, Apt 3 BITNET: jl42@andrew Pittsburgh, PA 15206 UUCP: uunet!nfsun!libove!libove (412) 362-8983 UUCP: psuvax1!pitt!darth!libove!libove
jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US (The Beach Bum) (10/15/88)
In article <cXIci8y00Uo101M10F@andrew.cmu.edu> jl42+@andrew.cmu.edu (Jay Mathew Libove) writes: >Someone mailed to me explaining that there is a problem >with the 2.2.1 SCO uux, and that I should just use my >old 2.1.3 version. > >He's right. 2.2.1 SCO uux is busted, 2.1.3 replaces >it nicely. What exactly is wrong with it? I use it several hundred times a day for news batching, remote file copies, remote printing, etc. and don't have any problems. The example which was given, which included an argument of `localsystem!filename' should have been written `filename' Is this the problem??? Or is there something else? -- John F. Haugh II +----Make believe quote of the week---- VoiceNet: (214) 250-3311 | Nancy Reagan on Richard Stallman: InterNet: jfh@rpp386.Dallas.TX.US | "Just say `Gno'" UucpNet : <backbone>!killer!rpp386!jfh +--------------------------------------