[comp.unix.xenix] Which Version Of Xenix to Buy??

hamilton@harrison.cs.unc.edu (Johnny Hamilton) (02/22/89)

I need help in chosing the correct version of Xenix.
Don't let me make any mistakes that you may have made --
what should I get (SCO Xenix,Microport, or what??)

SYSTEM:  IBM PS/2 Model 50/z
	 - 3.5" (1.44mb) diskette drive
	 - Intel 80286 processor
 	 - 3MB core (1MB motherboard, 2MB XMA Adapter)
	 - 300/1200 Baud Internal Modem
	 - 60MB Hard Drive


What version of Xenix should I buy?  I will be using the 
machine to log in at work which is a Unix environment --
primarily 4.3BSD and Sun OS/[3-4].   

My objective is to login from home, copy any files I need
to work on to my system at home, work in multiple windows
(What windowing system?? -- Xwindows for a PC?? Is there such
an animal??) and then copy files back across.

Options I would like to have in an OS: (Muli-tasking is a default)
1. Offers or promots some type of windowing system such as X-Windows
   or as the Suns do with Suntools.
2. Provide good documentation to the OS and perhaps telephonic
   support. 
3. Able to read/run dos or OS/2 programs and files.  
4. Provide C compiler with some type of debugger as in "dbxtool"


The mandatory list is that I have:
1.  The windowing environment.
2.  That the OS provides (or the Company  have for sale) a C compiler
    and perhaps a good window debugger as in Codview or dbxtool



Thank you very much,
Johnny Hamilton
hamilton@cs.unc.edu

davidsen@steinmetz.ge.com (William E. Davidsen Jr) (02/24/89)

In article <6902@thorin.cs.unc.edu> hamilton@harrison.cs.unc.edu (Johnny Hamilton) writes:

| SYSTEM:  IBM PS/2 Model 50/z
| 	 - 3.5" (1.44mb) diskette drive
| 	 - Intel 80286 processor
== you will really wish for the 386, not for speed but for the ability
== to run DOS programs.
|  	 - 3MB core (1MB motherboard, 2MB XMA Adapter)
| 	 - 300/1200 Baud Internal Modem
== you're not going to like this, either
| 	 - 60MB Hard Drive

| Options I would like to have in an OS: (Muli-tasking is a default)
| 1. Offers or promots some type of windowing system such as X-Windows
|    or as the Suns do with Suntools.
| 2. Provide good documentation to the OS and perhaps telephonic
|    support. 
== I don't know of any good documentation, Xenix is somewhat less terse
== than MicroPort, the last Interactive docs I saw were "how to use"
== flavor, rather than "how it works."
| 3. Able to read/run dos or OS/2 programs and files.  
== As far as I know you can't run OS/2 progs under *any* UNIX.
| 4. Provide C compiler with some type of debugger as in "dbxtool"
== what you get is 'sdb.' "sdb, you're no CodeView."

| The mandatory list is that I have:
| 1.  The windowing environment.
| 2.  That the OS provides (or the Company  have for sale) a C compiler
|     and perhaps a good window debugger as in Codview or dbxtool

  Honestly, why don't you buy PC-SLIP and X-windows for your PC, run
DOS, and use QuickC or MSC with CodeView? If you need OS/2 you can't run
it under UNIX, and a 286 only runs well behaved DOS programs under UNIX,
since an ill-behaved program can crash the system (also OS/2).

  I love UNIX of many flavors, but you seem to have a better fit with
DOS at this time. Xenix is slightly a better fit than other flavors of
UNIX because its C compiler will produce DOS executables directly. The
SCO3.2 version (about 3Q89) will produce OS/2 executables, too, but I
don't know if they're 'real' OS/2, or the so-called 'family model' which
will run on either DOS or OS/2.
-- 
	bill davidsen		(wedu@ge-crd.arpa)
  {uunet | philabs}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me