[comp.unix.xenix] Unix for a 386-PC: which is the best

ndeng@EULER.BERKELEY.EDU (09/29/89)

Hi All!

I am considering to purchase a UNIX operating system for my new 386 PC 
machine.  Having read all advertisements about different packages (Bell Technology UNIX 386 system V, 
Microport UNIX/386, 386/ix, SCO Xenix 386, etc, etc.), I got rather 
confused on which is the "best" one for a 386-based machine, since all of 
them claimed that their products are the best.  Therefore, I decide to 
turn to the netland for help.
Can someone who is using unix on a 386-pc machine tell me his experience about
the good/bad points about one of the packages?  Specifically, I am most 
interested in the following aspects::

   ---- The "completeness" of the package: (i.e., Does this package include
        all necessary tools which can be found in a mainframe unix system like
        4.xBSD or VMS/Ultrix, like cc, f77, awk, grep,..., and all utilities,
        even a typesetting program like TeX or troff)

   ---- The compatibility of the package with mainframe systems: can I 
        compile/without recomiple to run mainframe programs? 
  
   ---- The handling of X-Windows: does this package include all necessary
        tools to use X-windows with high resolution drivers for 1024x768
        or higher resolution monitors? 

   ---- Any specific problems with a PC machine, like effectiveness of resource
        sharing (CPU, Hard disk, communication port/ethernet, printer, etc.) 
        and multitasking. Also, how much overhead will the package take in the
        RAM and how much disk space have to be reserved for the package? Does 
        this package include a "DOS window" and how compatible is it with 
        standard DOS environment? (i.e., can I run DOS programs under this
        window? --- not just for file transfers). Is there any compatibility
        problem with a 386 PC (I mean, a clone using AT bus and Pheonix BIOS)?
       
   ---- Cost for the package (Basic system and complete package), and cost
        of technical support (Does the company offer good technical support
        or their phone lines are always busy?).

   ---- Bugs, strong/weak points, and your comments/suggestions/recommendations.
        Also, is the package very easy to install so I only need to buy a "box"
        and install myself, or I'd better to ask the company to install the
        package for me?

Please response to me directly since I do not read the net regularly and also 
tosave the bandwidth.  If this post generates enough interest/responses, 
I will post a summary later.

ndeng@euler.berkeley.edu