CURRAN@rcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu (Curran, Jim) (10/13/89)
Hi, I've been unsuccessful at putting JOVE together on a 386 Xenix Model 80. Has anyone put together JOVE or some other Emacs clone on a 386 Xenix system? Thanks in advance. Jim curran%rcgl1@eng.eng.ohio-state.edu
romkey@asylum.SF.CA.US (John Romkey) (10/15/89)
In article <3234@quanta.eng.ohio-state.edu> CURRAN@rcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu (Curran, Jim) writes: > I've been unsuccessful at putting JOVE together on a 386 Xenix >Model 80. Has anyone put together JOVE or some other Emacs clone on >a 386 Xenix system? Thanks in advance. I run proper GNU Emacs on asylum. It compiles fine under SCO Xenix 386 2.3.1 with no modifications other than configuring it.
srivas@udel.edu (Mandayam Srivas) (10/16/89)
In article <3234@quanta.eng.ohio-state.edu> CURRAN@rcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu (Curran, Jim) writes: > I've been unsuccessful at putting JOVE together on a 386 Xenix >Model 80. Has anyone put together JOVE or some other Emacs clone on >a 386 Xenix system? Thanks in advance. In article <7459@asylum.SF.CA.US> romkey@asylum.UUCP (Super user) writes: >I run proper GNU Emacs on asylum. It compiles fine under SCO Xenix 386 >2.3.1 with no modifications other than configuring it. I run uEmacs 3.9 on 286 Xenix2.2.3, works fine. The same source, compiled on 386AT 2.3.2 Xenix has several bugs especially when deleting buffers, or switching windows - the editor seems to loose its idea about where the cursor is, but regains it on typing something in the buffer. I wonder if this is a bug in uEmacs or 386AT Xenix. I did not look into the source code, since there already is a version 3.10 of uEmacs out. Srivas
clark@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Clark Brown) (10/22/89)
In article <7459@asylum.SF.CA.US>, romkey@asylum.SF.CA.US (John Romkey) writes: In article <3234@quanta.eng.ohio-state.edu> CURRAN@rcgl1.eng.ohio-state.edu (Curran, Jim) writes: > I've been unsuccessful at putting JOVE together on a 386 Xenix > >Model 80. Has anyone put together JOVE or some other Emacs clone on > >a 386 Xenix system? Thanks in advance. I have been running MicroEmacs 3.9 (available in the Usenet archives). It compiled and ran greate right out of the box... Clark
fischer@netmbx.UUCP (Axel Fischer) (10/23/89)
I have easily compiled and installed GNU emacs 18.55 under SCO Xenix i386 2.3.2. But if you have less than 4 MB I can't recommend the usage of GNU emacs. Try MicroEmacs instead. -Axel -- Domain: fischer@netmbx.UUCP Europe: ...!tmpmbx!netmbx!fischer Rest of world: ...!uunet!pyramid!tmpmbx!netmbx!fischer
wrp@biochsn.acc.Virginia.EDU (William R. Pearson) (10/23/89)
>I have easily compiled and installed GNU emacs 18.55 under SCO Xenix i386 >2.3.2. >But if you have less than 4 MB I can't recommend the usage of GNU emacs. >Try MicroEmacs instead. The absolute best emacs for Xenix (and DOS) is Epsilon from Lugaru Software. $195 retail, $150 from Programmers Shop, Programmers Connection, etc. Very fast, much closer to GNUemacs than Microemacs (I-search works), very well integrated into Xenix and Dos (Allows executing programs within an emacs buffer, provides FLOWCTRL option for people who cannot send ^S). Also provides a complete C-like programming language, with source code for the commands. I just wish it were available for more machines. Bill Pearson
ORCUTT@cc.utah.edu (10/25/89)
In article <2162@hudson.acc.virginia.edu>, wrp@biochsn.acc.Virginia.EDU (William R. Pearson) writes: >>I have easily compiled and installed GNU emacs 18.55 under SCO Xenix i386 >>2.3.2. >>But if you have less than 4 MB I can't recommend the usage of GNU emacs. >>Try MicroEmacs instead. > > The absolute best emacs for Xenix (and DOS) is Epsilon from Lugaru > Software. $195 retail, $150 from Programmers Shop, Programmers Connection, > etc. Very fast, much closer to GNUemacs than Microemacs (I-search works), > very well integrated into Xenix and Dos (Allows executing programs within > an emacs buffer, provides FLOWCTRL option for people who cannot send ^S). > Also provides a complete C-like programming language, with source code for > the commands. I just wish it were available for more machines. > > Bill Pearson