rac@sherpa.uucp (Roger Cornelius) (11/28/89)
Since installing the 2.2.? -> 2.3.2 upgrade for the 286, my /u
filesystem doesn't get fsck'd during the boot sequence. This happens
whether /u is dirty, or I specified "fsck=yes" in /etc/default/filesys
according to the man page for mnt(C). (the filesys(F) man page doesn't
mention the "fsck" keyword, only "fsckflags".)
If I understand correctly, when "fsck=yes" is specified the
filesystem is fsck'd regardless of whether it's dirty or not.
If the /u filesystem is dirty, the mount command just fails and
returns:
mount: mount failed
mount: Structure needs cleaning
Failed to mount /u filesystem
mount is invoked from /etc/rc.d/2/mntfs with the following command:
eval mnt -rc $AUTOFLAG $AUTOBOOT
I had this working in 2.2.3, and I think I have things set up
correctly now also. Can someone tell me if I've just missed
something, or is this a bug?
Following are my /etc/default/filesys and /etc/fstab files:
# /etc/default/filesys
bdev=/dev/root cdev=/dev/rroot \
mountdir=/ mount=no mountflags= \
fsck=no fsckflags= \
desc="The root filesystem" \
rcmount=no rcfsck=no
bdev=/dev/u mountdir=/u rcmount=yes \
fsckflags="-y -t /dev/scratch"
# /etc/fstab
/dev/u /u fsckflags="-y -D -t /dev/scratch"
Thanks for any suggestions.
--
Roger A. Cornelius rac@sherpa uunet!sherpa!racphil@lgnp1.LS.COM (Phil Eschallier) (11/28/89)
In article <183@sherpa.uucp> rac@sherpa.uucp (Roger Cornelius) writes: >Since installing the 2.2.? -> 2.3.2 upgrade for the 286, my /u >filesystem doesn't get fsck'd during the boot sequence. This happens >whether /u is dirty, or I specified "fsck=yes" in /etc/default/filesys >according to the man page for mnt(C). (the filesys(F) man page doesn't >mention the "fsck" keyword, only "fsckflags".) >If I understand correctly, when "fsck=yes" is specified the >filesystem is fsck'd regardless of whether it's dirty or not. > actually you need "rcfsck=yes" for cleaning during booting. i have posted before that the "rcfsck=dirty" does not work for 2.3.2 ('286). sco has said nothing. if you you get any help from them, please let me know. i have called sco and checked the sosco system -- there is no fix available yet. phil eschallier phil@ls.com btw -- please no flames for posting a "mail-type" response, this is to give sco another prompt.