roger@busmn.waiariki.ac.nz (Roger Hill) (10/23/89)
Followup-To:comp.unix.xenix
Hello all from down under.
I am using SCO TCP/IP (ver 1.0 beta) and am having a problem with ARP,
could somebody out there please help me.
When trying to create an arp entry to have this host act as an
Arp server ( arp -s mypc 0:0:c0:cf:c6:12 pub ) I get the following
message:
ioctl failed errno = 1
mypc : Not owner
Yes I did run this command as root, What is mypc not the owner of ?
I would be most interested in hearing from anybody else that is useing
SCO TCP/IP. Has anybody heard when a new release is due.
Many thanks in advance :-)
Roger ...
=- Roger Hill Computer studies Tutor & System Administrator -=
=- Snail mail: Waiariki Polytechnic, Private Bag, Rotorua, New Zealand -=
=- Phone: work +64 73 468 999 , home +64 73 477 635 -=
=- Dom: roger@waiariki.ac.nz , Bang: uunet!vuwcomp!nzfc!mof!busmn!roger -=akcs.larry@nstar.UUCP (Larry Snyder) (10/24/89)
>I am using SCO TCP/IP (ver 1.0 beta) and am having a problem with ARP, >could somebody out there please help me. I can't help you with your problems - but I am interested in learning about your experiences with TCP/IP. I would like to network this machine (running SCO 2.3.2) to another machine running DOS - what do I need, how well will it work and how much $$$? Larry
davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.COM (Wm E Davidsen Jr) (10/25/89)
We are pretty happy with SCO TCP (I don't think we've tried arp, tho). We have a number of people using it, including running SLIP of 'Blazers. I have no idea what you need to do TCP on the DOS machine (although I'd start with xenix ;-). -- bill davidsen (davidsen@crdos1.crd.GE.COM -or- uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen) "The world is filled with fools. They blindly follow their so-called 'reason' in the face of the church and common sense. Any fool can see that the world is flat!" - anon
rpeglar@csinc.UUCP (Rob Peglar x615) (10/25/89)
In article <1434@crdos1.crd.ge.COM>, davidsen@crdos1.crd.ge.COM (Wm E Davidsen Jr) writes: > > We are pretty happy with SCO TCP (I don't think we've tried arp, tho). > We have a number of people using it, including running SLIP of 'Blazers. > I have no idea what you need to do TCP on the DOS machine (although I'd > start with xenix ;-). > I'd like to poll the group about what h/w and s/w packages people are using to implement TCP/IP over Ethernet (at least FTP and telnet at the application level) on Xenix 2.3.2. E-mail your responses, I'll summarize and post. Thanks in advance, Rob -- Rob Peglar Control Systems, Inc. 2675 Patton Rd., St. Paul MN 55113 ...uunet!csinc!rpeglar 612-631-7800 The posting above does not necessarily represent the policies of my employer.
thurm@shorty.CS.WISC.EDU (Matthew Thurmaier) (10/28/89)
In article <1434@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> davidsen@crdos1.UUCP (bill davidsen) writes: > >I have no idea what you need to do TCP on the DOS machine (although I'd >start with xenix ;-). > >-- >bill davidsen (davidsen@crdos1.crd.GE.COM -or- uunet!crdgw1!crdos1!davidsen) I have Wollongong's WIN/TCP for DOS and UNIX. I'm not using the UNIX version (yet), but like the DOS version. I will be using it and the network to run X on my DOS machine starting next week. Until then, it's just used to terminal in and do file serving. Matthew. Snail Mail: E Mail: Matthew J. Thurmaier ...decvax!garp!harvard!uwvax!thurm The Computer Classroom matt@shorty.cs.wisc.edu 6701 Seybold Road, Ste. 122 Madison, WI 53719 (608) 271-2171 "why am I ALWAYS going somewhere?" >>-matt-->
bill@polygen.uucp (Bill Poitras) (12/11/89)
In article <[2543bdfd:94.1]comp.unix.xenix;1@nstar.UUCP> akcs.larry@nstar.UUCP (Larry Snyder) writes: %I can't help you with your problems - but I am interested in learning %about your experiences with TCP/IP. I would like to network this machine %(running SCO 2.3.2) to another machine running DOS - what do I need, %how well will it work and how much $$$? % %Larry Me too. +-----------------+---------------------------+-----------------------------+ | Bill Poitras | Polygen Corporation | {princeton mit-eddie | | (bill) | Waltham, MA USA | bu sunne}!polygen!bill | +-----------------+---------------------------+-----------------------------+
chip@ateng.com (Chip Salzenberg) (12/13/89)
SCO TCP/IP has worked well for me. We've sold version 1.0.0 (the so-called "controlled release") to several customers running Xenix 2.3.1, and we use it in-house as well. We use it with the WD8003 (EtherLink Plus). It's great. The development kit in particular is _super_. Porting BSD code is a snap. However, it does have one fault. The resolver library is broken. We've stuck with host files. If the lack of a resolver is a problem, I think you can pick up BSD's, and I know that porting it to SCO TCP/IP will be easy. -- You may redistribute this article only to those who may freely do likewise. Chip Salzenberg at A T Engineering; <chip@ateng.com> or <uunet!ateng!chip> "The Usenet, in a very real sense, does not exist."