drew@se-sd.NCR.COM (Drew Lettington) (02/09/90)
I am currently in the process of setting up a development envrionment
which will eventually link NCR Tower, NCR ITX and PC systems. File transfer
will be accomplished using TCP/IP. I would like to have NFS or RFS in the
future. What I am wondering is if anyone has had any experience using
either SCO's Xenix or Interactive's 386/ix operating system? Which costs
less, which has better performance, which is easier to use? Any info you
have will be greatly appreciated.
Please reply via e-mail. I will post a summary of all comments I
receive.
--
drew@se-sd.sandiego.NCR.COM | Olga Corbet drives me mad
Drew Lettington | I'll buy some vodka for her dad
NCR Systems Engineering San Diego | -- Jazz Butcher neal@mnopltd.UUCP (02/10/90)
........ ->future. What I am wondering is if anyone has had any experience using ->either SCO's Xenix or Interactive's 386/ix operating system? Which costs ->less, which has better performance, which is easier to use? Any info you Naaahh.. nobody like that in this newsgroup.. nobody in here but us chickens..
jbayer@ispi.UUCP (Jonathan Bayer) (02/10/90)
neal@mnopltd.UUCP writes: >........ >->future. What I am wondering is if anyone has had any experience using >->either SCO's Xenix or Interactive's 386/ix operating system? Which costs >->less, which has better performance, which is easier to use? Any info you I just finished install the Interactive 386/ix os on a customer's computer. My impression was that it is a reliable system, but lacks some of the polishing that SCO Xenix has. In terms of reliability, SCO Xenix has been around a lot longer than the 386/ix. JB -- Jonathan Bayer Intelligent Software Products, Inc. (201) 245-5922 500 Oakwood Ave. jbayer@ispi.COM Roselle Park, NJ 07204