mason@oct1.UUCP (David Mason) (05/01/90)
In article <836@sixhub.UUCP> davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr) writes: >In article <1990Apr26.130747.6047@virtech.uucp> cpcahil@virtech.UUCP (Conor P. Cahill) writes: > >| Several quotes about the "need" for comp.unix.sco were quoted in >| this article. It appears to me that most of them were from SCO. Cahill's incoming mail looks somewhat like the result of some sort of internal office memo at SCO saying "get out there and post `Viva comp.unix.sco' ". However, I think it is important to keep the issues in perspective at this stage. Cahill's posting may have been provocative, but the issue is still comp.unix.sco. Let's vote about that, not Cahill's style. This is strictly my opinion. -------------------- David | mason@oct1 (David Mason) | ...!uunet!ddsw1!olsa99!oct1!mason