shwake@raysnec.UUCP (Ray Shwake) (06/01/90)
In article <1990May31.005321.21881@ddsw1.MCS.COM> karl@mcs.MCS.COM (Karl Denninger) writes: >This >is< the same problem, at least on ISC. > >There is a one-line fix (that I've previously posted) for ISC. I suspect >that this patch will fix it for Xenix as well. Don't know if Karl was speaking of the WD 1006 only or the 1006 family. I'm currenly running a WD 1006V with both Xenix/386 2.3.2 and ISC 2.0.2. Neither has ever exhibited a problem that could be remotely traced to the hard disk subsystem.
davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr) (06/05/90)
In article <42@raysnec.UUCP> shwake@raysnec.UUCP (Ray Shwake) writes: | Don't know if Karl was speaking of the WD 1006 only or the 1006 family. | I'm currenly running a WD 1006V with both Xenix/386 2.3.2 and ISC 2.0.2. | Neither has ever exhibited a problem that could be remotely traced to the | hard disk subsystem. Are you by chance running only one drive? I never had a problem until I got two drives and a really fragmented filesystem. -- bill davidsen - davidsen@sixhub.uucp (uunet!crdgw1!sixhub!davidsen) sysop *IX BBS and Public Access UNIX moderator of comp.binaries.ibm.pc and 80386 mailing list "Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me