[comp.unix.xenix] man page system for SCO Xenix

NEASE@MAINE.BITNET (08/13/90)

A client of mine has SCO Xenix 2.3.2 on a 386.  I'm used to BSD and its
man page setup, instead of the skimpy help system on Xenix.  I tried talking
to sales-types at SCO about a man page system.  Some of them thought that
maybe the text processing package *might* have the man page support, others
weren't sure.  Upgrading to SCO Unix 3.2 simply to get man pages is not
an option.
 
Does anybody know which, if any, SCO product for Xenix has the man support?
If there is no such animal, does anybody know of a good public domain or
shareware implementation (ftp-able/uucp-able/modem-able preferably).  An
inexpensive (within a couple of hundred dollars) commercial package would
also be ok.
 
In advance, thanks.
 
 
   Reid M. Pinchback

root@herctec.UUCP (Super user) (08/13/90)

In article <90224.143130NEASE@MAINE.BITNET> NEASE@MAINE.BITNET writes:
>A client of mine has SCO Xenix 2.3.2 on a 386.  I'm used to BSD and its
>man page setup, instead of the skimpy help system on Xenix.  I tried talking
>to sales-types at SCO about a man page system.  Some of them thought that
>maybe the text processing package *might* have the man page support, others
>weren't sure.  Upgrading to SCO Unix 3.2 simply to get man pages is not
>an option.
> 
>Does anybody know which, if any, SCO product for Xenix has the man support?
[...]
>   Reid M. Pinchback

	I may be naive on this subject, but for my Xenix 2.3.2 setup,
getting the man pages for everything was a matter of inserting the
disk labelled "On-Line Manual Pages."

	It's rather strange that the SCO people didn't know what you
were talking about.  Either (a) they're clueless, (b) what I have here
was only released on a limited basis (granted, the majority of Xenix
systems I've been on have no man pages installed), or (c) I'm just
imagining things!

	BTW, I have man pages on the text processing system, as well as
the development system and all the basics, like the "ls" command and
uucp...



-- 
=====  Dylan Rhodes: Tech Support Manager, Hercules Computer Technology  ======
  Voice: 415-540-6000  BBS: 415-540-0621  uucp: hoptoad!asylum!herctec!shark
I doubt if Hercules has an opinion on this; if they do, it's probably not mine.
===============================================================================

cnews@cix.cix.UUCP (Cliff Stanford) (08/15/90)

In article <90224.143130NEASE@MAINE.BITNET> NEASE@MAINE.BITNET writes:
>               Upgrading to SCO Unix 3.2 simply to get man pages is not
>an option.

	I hate to disillusion you but you don't get nroff/troff with
Unix either.  You have to buy the addon 'text processing' package.
Rip-off or what?

evil@arcturus.uucp (Wade Guthrie) (08/16/90)

In article <90224.143130NEASE@MAINE.BITNET> NEASE@MAINE.BITNET writes:
>[. . .]  I tried talking
>to sales-types at SCO about a man page system.  Some of them thought that
>maybe the text processing package *might* have the man page support, others
>weren't sure.  [. . .]
> 
>Does anybody know which, if any, SCO product for Xenix has the man support?

Yeah, get the text processing package.  You need that for the ...roff package
to make the man pages come out on the screen.  I don't know why the dudes at
SCO didn't know that -- it seems to be common knowledge around here.

tanner@cdis-1.compu.com (Dr. T. Andrews) (08/21/90)

In the cited article, evil@arcturus.uucp (Wade Guthrie) writes:
) get the text processing package.  You need that for the ...roff
) package to make the man pages come out on the screen.
Unfortunately, this isn't the entire story.  Yes, it  seems  that
you  have  to  buy  the  text processing package to get the "man"
pages.

However, the man pages themselves are shipped as very  bad  nroff
output.   You can't usefully run them through with a neater macro
package, or  print  them  more  neatly  on  your  "better"  nroff
printer, or use them with "troff" and your troff previewer.
-- 
uflorida!ki4pv!cdis-1!tanner {uunet dsinc}!cdin-1!cdis-1!tanner

ronald@robobar.co.uk (Ronald S H Khoo) (08/21/90)

In article <00001XO@cdis-1.compu.com> tanner@cdis-1.compu.com
	(Dr. T. Andrews) writes:

> However, the man pages themselves are shipped as very  bad  nroff
> output.

In the 2.2 man page set, yes, in the 2.3 man page set they were
distributed as [nt]roff -man source (at least mine were :-).  With
psroff 2.0 (out soon in comp.sources.unix) you can make very nice output
with them on your laser printer using the grotty C/A/T troff supplied
by SCO.  I wish they'd ship a bugfixed version of troff though.  SCO's
ancient one barfs on the Berzerkeley -me macro package :-(

-- 
Eunet: Ronald.Khoo@robobar.Co.Uk  Phone: +44 81 991 1142  Fax: +44 81 998 8343
Paper: Robobar Ltd. 22 Wadsworth Road, Perivale, Middx., UB6 7JD ENGLAND.

wrp@biochsn.acc.Virginia.EDU (William R. Pearson) (08/22/90)

>with them on your laser printer using the grotty C/A/T troff supplied
>by SCO.  I wish they'd ship a bugfixed version of troff though.  SCO's
>ancient one barfs on the Berzerkeley -me macro package :-(

	Actually, it is relatively simple to get SCO's troff to work
with the -me macros.  You need to edit the macros so that constructions
of the form:

	.if .... \{ ... \}

become:

	.if ... \{
	   ...
	\}

	Here is the text of an earlier msg that explains the solution:

]The problem is with the .if directive.  In fact, the first offender is
]one of the first ones in tmac.e.  You cannot continue a .if with a
]backslash, unless you also use braces around the body.  I'm not sure if
]the opening brace must appear on the same line or not.
]
]Anyway, I was finally able to get it working just by editing the .if stuff.
]-- 
]						Greg Woods.
]
]UUCP: utgpu!woods, utgpu!{ontmoh, ontmoh!ixpierre}!woods
]VOICE: (416) 242-7572 [h]		LOCATION: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

	Bill Pearson

simon@ms.uky.edu (G. Simon Gales) (08/23/90)

While we're on the subject, has anyone noticed that some manual pages
are not accessible?  Try the man page for uuinstall or configure.  It
seems that the M in the ADM suffix is missing on these files.  Look in
/usr/man/man.ADM for more details.  It's easy to fix too, just seems
to have gotten truncated somewhere along the line.

-- 
               Simon Gales@The University of Kentucky
   simon@ms.uky.edu    simon@UKMA.BITNET   {rutgers, uunet}!ukma!simon

 Power is danger.  -- The Centurion, "Balance of Terror," stardate 1709.2.