[comp.misc] Colorful Quips about Connection Machines

jaw@eos.UUCP (James A. Woods) (07/26/88)

a smattering of comments from an article in Computerworld, July 18, 1988.

The protagonist:
	Bill Dunn, executive VP of Dow Jones & Co.,
	a 1.4 billion dollar information services giant,
	who just spent a piddling $5.3 million on ...

The machine:
	(two) Connection Machine(s), to supplement some IBM 3090s,
	4300s, and DEC VAXen they'd rather junk.

The initial impression:
	"It was a 12-sided hypercube -- I thought that was something
	you put in a drink," Dunn recalls.

The problem:
	"We have this fantastic service," Dunn says, "a wonderful business
	amalgam of 70 billion characters of information on computers in
	networks, on packet switches, with terminals and personal computers.
	And if I walk up to this fantastic collection and say 'How is Boeing
	doing in its competition with Airbus?'  I'll wait ... and wait ...
	and then I'll see 'Zero documents.'  Then I play the machine's game.
	I type in 'Boeing' ... I get 8,763 documents.  I try Boeing and Airbus
	... 392 documents.  And the meter is ticking at $2.40 per minute,
	and someone wants the answer and you're on the phone and sweating a
	bit.  Then I say, 'The heck with it, it's not worth it.'
	Dunn is outspoken in his disdain for the unfathomable "Boolean"
	gibberish need to prompt today's computers.

The solution:
	Thinking Machines Inc. relevance searching algorithm with feedback,
	programmed in C on a VAX frontend.

or, as Bill puts it:
	"The Connection Machine is really an idiot.  It runs like a
	son of a bitch, but it drools at the end of a 100-yard dash.
	You have to have another mechanism that wipes its mouth, pulls
	its pants up and takes it over to get the blue ribbon."

The prize:
	Real-time access to six months of hundreds of publications like
	The Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Business Week, USA Today, etc.
	Viewing the investment as a "drop in the bucket" compared to
	$250 million the company spends just on printing presses, Dunn
	forsees the purchase of "many, many more" such machines.

Summing up:
	"With Thinking Machines, we were the great white hope," Dunn says.
	"They were tired of blasting missiles out of the air or splicing
	genes in a mouse gonad.  Here was something that could actually
	benefit mankind."