[sci.space.shuttle] Comsats

mcdowell@cfa250.harvard.edu (Jonathan McDowell) (11/14/88)

From article <1988Nov13.062139.1075@utzoo.uucp>, by henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer):
[First comsat..]
>Take your pick of SCORE, Relay, Telstar, or
> Syncom II, in -- I think -- that order.  
I would go for Courier IB, a 1960 satellite which was the first active
repeater. Like SCORE, it was a US Army Signals Corps effort. (Courier
IA didnt make it to orbit.) I agree that the 1958 SCORE doesnt really count;
the Soviet Korabl'-Sputnik in 1960 did much the same thing, too. The NASA/RCA
Relay in 1962 wasn't that much of a gain on Courier; AT&T's Telstar I 
does have the honor of the first transatlantic messages. The first
Molniya-1 went up in Apr 1965. 

> Syncom II (dunno what happened to Syncom I, launch failure?) was the first
> more-or-less Clarke-orbit comsat, 

Syncom I had its apogee motor blow up. Syncom II was inclined 33 deg to the equator,
Syncom III was really the first GEO sat, in Aug 1964 I think.

Jonathan McDowell.

henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) (11/15/88)

In article <1158@cfa237.cfa250.harvard.edu> mcdowell@cfa250.harvard.edu (Jonathan McDowell) writes:
>I would go for Courier IB, a 1960 satellite which was the first active
>repeater...

@#@#%$#, I forgot about Courier.  You're right.

>> Syncom II (dunno what happened to Syncom I, launch failure?) was the first
>> more-or-less Clarke-orbit comsat, 
>
>Syncom I had its apogee motor blow up. Syncom II was inclined 33 deg...

Yes, that's why I said "more-or-less Clarke-orbit".  It was close enough,
with its apparent motion in the sky slow enough, to demonstrate that the
idea was workable but that an equatorial orbit was in order.
-- 
Sendmail is a bug,             |     Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
not a feature.                 | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu