steve@eos.UUCP (Steve Philipson) (08/24/89)
There has been considerable discussion in this group concerning the jet engines used in the Soviet space shuttle program. The July 24 issue of Aviation Week contained some information on this. Excerpts are included below. Please accept my apologies if this has already been posted -- I've been off the net for a few weeks and thus would have missed it. Soviet designers originally had planned to equip their space shuttle orbiters with two jet engines that would have been used, if necessary, to modify the spacecraft's flight path in the atmosphere prior to its runway landing. The two Lyulka nonafterburning engines were to have been installed on the aft fuselage, positioned on each side of the vertical stabilizer. Their nacelles were to have been covered with thermal protection for the orbital portion of the mission, and their inlets blocked by covers that remained in the closed position until atmospheric reentry. "Our designers originally thought the two engines might be need to make corrections on the glideslope during final approach," he said. "However, approach and landing tests performed with the atmospheric test vehicle showed that control was sufficient without these engines." The jet engines were similar to those used on Sukhoi Su-27s, and would have provided sufficient thrust only for flight path modifications on final approach, he said. They would not have permitted the spacecraft to maintain horizontal flight, nor make a go-around for another landing. A decision not to use the engines was made about 1.5 years ago, and the orbiter Buran was therefore not equipped with the powerplants when launched on its unmanned test mission last November. The spacecraft made an accurate approach and touchdown on the Baikonur Cosmodrome despite heavy winds. The engines were installed, however, on a full-scale non-spaceflight orbiter vehicle that was used for atmospheric flight testing. Two more Lyulka engines -- these equipped with afterburners -- were installed on the sides of the atmospheric test orbiter as well, and the combined thrust was sufficient to power the vehicle on takeoff from a runway, through a climb-out to the holding altitude, and on the return to landing. -- Steve (the certified flying fanatic) steve@eos.arc.nasa.gov