[sci.space.shuttle] SLC-6

Greg_d._Moore@mts.rpi.edu (Commander Krugannal) (12/19/89)

     Above someone stated that SLC-6 (or slick-6) was an acronym for
   the Shuttle Launch Complex-6. This does not seem correct. I mean
   why is it #6? and then
   > 5) Yes, it would probably cost more to convert SLC-6 to a marginally useful
   >  Titan IV launch site than it would to build a new SLC-7. 
   --Glenn Serre
     What is SLC-7 then?
 
     One of the reasons I believe that SLC was shut down, was that
   the contractors did a lousy job using substandard parts. Among
   other things the plumbing was not up to the job required of it.
 
     Btw, does anyone know anything more about the Shuttle-C?
      Specifically, when is the first expected launch date?
      what size payload will it be able to carry?
      Stuff like that.
 
   Disclaimer: Why do *I* need one?

henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) (12/20/89)

In article <10556.911.forumexp@mts.rpi.edu> Greg_d._Moore@mts.rpi.edu (Commander Krugannal) writes:
>     Btw, does anyone know anything more about the Shuttle-C?
>      Specifically, when is the first expected launch date?

There is no expected launch date yet; Shuttle-C is not yet an approved
project.  Maybe 1995 if it gets the go-ahead.

>      what size payload will it be able to carry?

Depends on exactly what configuration you use, notably how many SSMEs and
whether it uses the forthcoming advanced SRB.  I seem to recall nominal
numbers for three SSMEs and advanced SRBs somewhere around 150klbs.
-- 
1755 EST, Dec 14, 1972:  human |     Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
exploration of space terminates| uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu

cew@venera.isi.edu (Craig E. Ward) (12/20/89)

In article <10556.911.forumexp@mts.rpi.edu> Greg_d._Moore@mts.rpi.edu (Commander Krugannal) writes:
>
>     Above someone stated that SLC-6 (or slick-6) was an acronym for
>   the Shuttle Launch Complex-6. This does not seem correct. I mean
>   why is it #6? and then
>   > 5) Yes, it would probably cost more to convert SLC-6 to a marginally useful
>   >  Titan IV launch site than it would to build a new SLC-7. 
>   --Glenn Serre
>     What is SLC-7 then?

I believe the acronym stands for "Space Launch Complex."

I toured Vandenberg last spring and saw (but did not photograph -- that would
be a security violation ;-) two other SLC-n sites that are used for ELVs.
(Didn't get to see the AMROC launch complex.)

SLC-6 was originally built for the USAF MOL (Manned Orbiting Laboratory)
program of the mid-60s.  The complex was moth-balled.  It may be refurbished
to launch the Titan IVs.
-- 
Craig E. Ward <cew@venera.isi.edu> 	Slogan:	"nemo me impune lacessit"
USPS:	USC Information Sciences Institute
	4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 1100
	Marina del Rey, CA 90292