vu0112@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu (Cliff Joslyn) (06/14/89)
In article <Jun.13.19.36.26.1989.6999@yes.rutgers.edu> emuleomo@yes.rutgers.edu (Emuleomo) writes: >> With reference to the use of PLINK86 or the DOS LINK(ER) for linking >> Clipper .OBJs > >Even faster for clipper linking is "tlink" Turbo Linker from the magicians >at Borland International!! However, overlays are not supported. Big deal huh! For a long time PLink was the only real overlay linker around, and it was *painfully* slow. I got an order of magnitude improvement in link times first moving to MSLink and thence TLink. I only used PLink for final production linking. But now we have RTLink, a new overlay linker. I'm glad for that, but has anyone used it, and compared for link time in a typical clipper application? -- O----------------------------------------------------------------------> | Cliff Joslyn, Cybernetician at Large | Systems Science, SUNY Binghamton, vu0112@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu V All the world is biscuit shaped. . .