[comp.databases] Database Survey

timk@egvideo.UUCP (Tim Kuehn) (06/08/89)

I am doing an informal survey of the various dbase III/+ type database
packages out in the world today and what their users think of them. As this
is not anything near formal all comments are welcome - from ease of 
programmability to speed to thoughts about the company (no excessively
long flames though please!). Essentially I'm interested in what you, the user
community thinks about the various packages. Some applicable questions I can
think of to consider would be:

1) Speed
2) Ease of programming
3) Package reliability
4) Responsiveness of the manufacturer to user input
5) Manufacturer support
6) User interface from a programmer's and end user's perspective
7) Cost effectiveness (were the features/functionality it gave you 
	worth the $$$ you shelled out for it?) 
8) Portability - application in single-user and multi-user environemnts
	(read Novell/networking and/or Xenix) and how easy was it to port 
	between them.
9) Other catagories you may think of.

Please feel free to express any and all thoughts you have on the packages
you've ACTUALLY used. (Opinions about the recent A-T/Fox SW legal proceedings
aren't really relavent to this since I'm only looking for information on the 
DBMS from an applications standpoint. If you disagree with this feel free to 
say so).

If enough people respond to this I'll summarize to the net.

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Timothy D. Kuehn					timk@egvideo          |
|TDK Consulting Services			        !watmath!egvideo!timk |
|871 Victoria St. North, Suite 217A					      |
|Kitchener, Ontario, Canada N2B 3S4 		        (519)-741-3623 	      |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

emuleomo@yes.rutgers.edu (Emuleomo) (06/14/89)

> In reference to the article on Dbase III+ compatible database survey
> from timk@egvideo.UUCP
>

If you ask me, there are only 2 clones out there.

a) Foxbase plus 
and
b) Clipper

Choosing between these 2 can be difficult but you may consider the following
points.

                       Foxbase plus       Clipper
                       ============       =======
Integrated Env.            Yes            No
Interpreter                Yes            No (check a product called Dclip)
Dbase III+ compatibility   Unrivalled     Too many deviations
                       (Supports &macros 
                        even better than 
                        DbaseIII+ !!)
Compiler                   Yes            Yes
Debugger                   Limited        Yes
Overall speed              Fastest        Just a shade slower
Can produce EXE files      No             Yes
Feature set                Quite rich     Richer
Third party support        Extensive      Unrivalled
Overall reliability        Most reliable  A few bugs here and there

Personal bias:- Go with Foxbase plus. (Coming out soon is DbIV compatible
                                       FOXPRO which promises to blow DBIV
                                       outa the water!!!)

--Emuleomo O.O.  (emuleomo@yes.rutgers.edu)
-- 
** Research is what I'm doing when I dont know what I'm doing! **

jack.bzoza@canremote.uucp (JACK BZOZA) (06/17/89)

My experience has been limited primarily to dBase and dBase clones.  I
first learned dBase II on CP/M 8" disks and have always considered the
learning curve of other database programs too steep to justify climbing.
I have toyed with other databases but I have not yet come upon an
application that I couldn't do with my current dBase-like program.

These have gone from dBase II, dBase III, dBase III+, Foxbase 2.1

I switched to Foxbase about a year ago and find that it blows dBase
away.

1) Speed
   - about 6 to 10 times faster than dBase

2) Ease of programming
   - the same programming language but with a considerable number of
     valuable extensions including UserDefinedFunctions, Menus, etc.

3) Package reliability
   - haven't seen a crash or lost an index yet.  Fixed many of dBase's
     bugs

4) Responsiveness of the manufacturer to user input
   - haven't had any reason to find out

5) Manufacturer support
   - as above

6) User interface from a programmer's and end user's perspective
   - same as dBase - i.e. so-so

7) Cost effectiveness
   - absolutely worth the $$$

8) Portability
   - versions available for DOS, SCO UNIX, Novell
   - no fiddling necessary as the programs will run once additional code
     has been inserted for running in a multi-user environment but
     utilities exist which will go through the code and put in all the
     record locking stuff for you

Be <C>hatting with you.....
---
 * QDeLuxe 1.10 #168  Lead, follow or get out of the way !