patth@dasys1.UUCP (Patt Haring) (10/22/87)
Welcome to NETWEAVER
The interactive, intersystem
newsletter of the
Electronic Networking Association
"Our purpose is to promote electronic networking in ways that
enrich individuals, enhance organizations, and build global
communities."
_______________________________________________________________
Volume 3, Number 10 October 1987
Copyright(c) by Electronic Networking Association (ENA), 1987
NETWEAVER is published electronically on Networking and
World Information (NWI), 333 East River Drive, East Hartford,
CT, 06108 (1-800-624-5916) using Participate (R) sofware from
Network Technologies International, Inc. (NETI), Ann Arbor, MI.
Managing Editor: Lisa Carlson
Contributing Editors: Mike Blaszczak
Al Martin
Stan Pokras
George Por
Peg Rossing
Tom Sherman
Philip Siddons
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
NETWEAVER is available via NewsNet, the world's leading
vendor of full-text business and professional newsletters
online. Read, Search or Scan all issues of NETWEAVER as TE55
in NewsNet's Telecommunications industry category. For access
details call 800-345-1301. In PA or outside the U.S., call
215-527-8030.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
We *welcome* anyone interested in joining the Netweaver staff!
The deadline for articles for the next issue is
the 15th of the month.
KUDOS to the "porters," unsung heroes of the Network Nation!
One of them has brought this issue to you.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Volume 3, Number 10 ---CONTENTS--- October 1987
1 Masthead and Index
2 ENA UPDATE ................................ by Lisa Carlson
(2282 char)
Introduction to this issue of The Netweaver: last
chance to write to the FCC, and an invitation to
join the ENA conference planning team.
3 COMPUTER FEAR .......................... by Stephanie Kott
(5187 char)
A report on Mike Greenly's interview with leading
experts on computer phobias and the online discussion
which followed.
4 LAP TOP PUBLISHING (Part I) .......... by Phillip Siddons
(6186 char)
a case study report of how a creative ad man turned to
his laptop when deadlines loomed.
5 LAP TOP PUBLISHING (Part II) ......... by Phillip Siddons
(5087 char)
6 ELECTRONIC DEMOCRACY (Part I) ............. by Dave Hughes
(5096 char)
Dave Huges shares some of the wisdom about
applications of electronic networking to politics.
7 ELECTRONIC DEMOCRACY (Part II) ............ by Dave Hughes
(4154 char)
8 MEMBERSHIP FORM
2 (of 8) ENA EDITOR Oct. 18, 1987 at 16:48 Eastern (2282 characters)
ENA NETWEAVER Volume 3, Number 10, Article 2 (October 1987)
ENA Update
by Lisa Carlson
One of the most talked about obstacles to wide acceptance of
the medium of computer conferencing is "computer fear." Mike
Greenly interviewed Drs. Michelle Weil and Larry Rosen on the
subject and shared the results with his online readers. In this
issue of NETWEAVER, Stefanie Kott reports on Mike's interview
and the lively discussion which followed.
People who fall in love with computer conferencing soon fall in
love with something else - laptop computers! Read about a real
life "case study" of how an ad was created via laptop by Philip
Siddons.
The presidential campaign of 1988 is already well underway.
Discussions of how computer conferencing could support the
political process both before AND after the election have
started up on many networks. A couple of candidates have set
up their own private systems and more will probably follow.
Dave Hughes has probably had more experience than anyone in the
world at using an online system as an integral part of local
politics. We've collected a series of Dave's online comments
for NETWEAVER readers about his experience and what he's
concluded about the place of electronic communication at the
grass-roots level.
The effectiveness of online "calls for action" is being tested
this month. The FCC is accepting comments on proposed new
rules which may have an effect on online costs (CC Docket
87-215) until October 26th so there's still time to make your
views known. See past issues of NETWEAVER for a range of
viewpoints on this issue and get YOUR comments in on time!
Comments should be addressed to: The Honorable Dennis R.
Patrick, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission,
Washington, D.C. 20554.
Get ready to mark your calendar! We will soon announce the
exact dates for the next ENA f-t-f meeting which will take place
in Philadelphia in May '88. If you have an idea for the
program or would like to participate in putting this event
together, let us know soon. Everyone with an interest in
computer conferencing is welcome to participate.
We're always looking for more articles and article ideas for
NETWEAVER. What would YOU like to see here next month?
3 (of 8) ENA EDITOR Oct. 18, 1987 at 16:48 Eastern (5187 characters)
ENA NETWEAVER Volume 3, Number 10, Article 3 (October 1987)
"COMPUTER FEAR"
(Another Mike Greenly Special)
by Stefanie Kott
Mike Greenly, the online roving camera, invited members of NWI
to meet two Ph.D.'s in psychology, Michelle Weil and Larry
Rosen, a married couple who specialze in treating
computerphobia. He took us into their living room, described
it and their casual dress, breathed life into their dynamic
relationship, and then got down to business.
"Phobic reactions to technology appear to be one reason so many
bank customers still avoid actively using the widely installed
base of cash-card terminals...or...learning how to program the
videotape recorders they own, or...using all the features of
their microwave ovens," Michelle said. Add to this the fact
that Larry teaches courses in statistics requiring computer
use, and that he finds that over half his students demonstrate
fear of computers--a quarter of them with degrees of panic--and
you have motivation to explore the phenomenon of computerphobia
seriously.
Michelle, Larry, and Dr. Deborah Sears, who work out of
California State University in Dominquez Hills, California,
applied for, and received, a three-year Fund for the
Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE) grant to develop
"a treatment model for eliminating the effects of fear that
hold people back from computers and their importance in
business and education," Mike explained.
The research team has identified three types of computerphobia
and treatment for each. In brief:
The Anxious Computerphobic, who exhibits physical symptoms such
as sweaty palms and back tension, is treated with systematic
desensitization. Treatment includes relaxation techniques
employed while imagining situations in which
computers have been a source of anxiety.
The Cognitive Computerphobic, who appears calm but is certain
that the computer is smarter |han he or she is, is made aware
of his or her negative feelings. Then an attempt is made to
stop the negative thoughts by "creating a void" where negative
thinking was, and replacing the negative thoughts with positive
ones. The end result of this approach, essentially, is to give
these computerphobics a feeling of competence.
Treatment for the Uncomfortable User is done in groups of ten
and is designed to develop computer awareness and eliminate
misconceptions about the computer. Among other things done in
this treatment process, the insides of a computer are shown and
floppy disks are cut apart.
There is improvement with all their subjects, and the study is
ongoing. Some of the interesting facts that
emerge include:
* There is not necessarily as much comfort among young people
as we tend to think.
* Young people who play arcade games do not necessarily take
well to computers.
* Teachers are often computerphobic. When students learn from
computerphobics, the results are predicatable.
* People who are adept at the computer should not assume that
friends and members of their families will approach computer
use with equal ease.
The unshaking belief that computers will continue to be
important in our lives underlies the motivation of the
researchers to help as many computerphobics as they can. Their
goals include expanding the program to reach more teachers,
businesspeople, and even governments agencies both in the U.S.
and abroad.
As always in Mike's interviews, the readers are invited to
contribute their ideas about the topic. And, as usual, many of
the readers did. There was a lively discussion of computer fear
itself, as opposed to real phobias about computers. A few
people pointed out that those who experience real phobias have
emotionally based reactions of deeper origin than those who
experience computer fear. Also discussed was the fact that
there has been too little study done in this area even to have
an adequate construct to describe the phenomenon, and that
computer fear will likely be found to result from numerous
personal, cultural, and subcultural factors as yet not fully
understood.
A healthy discussion developed around the idea of legitimizing
the notion of computer fear too much. Some readers feel that
enthusiasm about technology and what it can do, coupled with
excitement about learning it, far surpass treating people as
if there are problems inherent in the process they are entering
as they begin to learn to use computers.
Some offered advice about dealing with people who are fearful
of computers. One believes that starting with a laptop like the
Radio Shack Model 100 is advantageous because the perception of
it is that it is more typewriter-like than computer-like, and
therefore less threatening. A few readers expressed the feeling
that using analogies to things known are helpful, such as
likening memory to the brain of the computer. Others believe it
is key to let people know that they cannot hurt the computer by
pressing a wrong key, and that the computer is not, in fact,
smarter than they are.
If you would like to see more of what was said in the latest of
Mike's eclectic explorations, come to NWI and JOIN "COMPUTER
FEAR."
4 (of 8) ENA EDITOR Oct. 18, 1987 at 16:49 Eastern (6186 characters)
ENA NETWEAVER Volume 3, Number 10, Article 4 (October 1987)
Lap Top Publishing (Part I)
by Philip Siddons
Like people with bladder problems who intuitively know the
location of public rest room facilities, finding a grounded
electrical outlet for my plug-in portable computer has become
second nature.
With my usual luck, I've managed to find a table not only next
to an outlet, but beside the two story picture window
overlooking 57th and 40th.
It's ten AM and beneath me flows a river of taxies, limos,
buses, and upscale cars through the canyons of skyscrapers.
People were walking on the traffic's banks with stern
determination, seemingly confident they will reach their
offices. Cautious enough to wear jogging shoes in contrast to
their suits. Athletic wear to catch up to a bus? Outrun
another taxi hunter? Perhaps to run away from a would be
mugger? Everyone in New York has a story. It's a jungle out
there.
I had counted my odds when passing the tall and bedranggled
looking bag man on the street outside the Hyatt. Was he
exposing himself to the picture window? No, just talking in
argumentative tones to the manikin in the store window. Would
he turn his rage on me?
"VISITING ADVERTISING DIRECTOR BRUTALLY SLAIN OUTSIDE HOTEL."
More probably:
"UNKNOWN MAN SLAIN BY CRAISED FORMER STOCK EXCHANGE
EXECUTIVE."
There's something unique about eating breakfast while
overlooking 57th and 40th. The restaurant is deserted. The
late morning hour has dictated that lodgers must be at their
points of interest or company conferences. They're out in the
canyons of metropolis, trying to get their vacation money's
worth, or their company's money's worth.
I've already taken an early morning stroll down the street and
purchased a T-shirt for my daughter. Great graphic of a
collection of people riding on a bus. Most of their faces look
bewildered. The caption below is "New York City, only the
strong survive." Only a Manhatten native could have written
that copy. Not something I've seen on posters produced by the
chamber of commerce for travel agencies.
And when you order an eighteen dollar breakfast, the cheapest
on the menu, while overlooking this sea of humanity in
transport through the architecture, your breakfast companion is
guilt. Will the company really believe that this breakfast cost
eighteen dollars? How come I'm not out there in the flow of
humanity, on my way to being productive in society, instead of
sitting in this luxurious restaurant?
The tall black gangly bag man I quickly passed on my way back
into the fortress of the Hyatt has appeared on the far corner.
Now he's talking to the Citycorp building on the adjacent
corner. I thought that if I had any breakfast left over, I
would take give it to the fellow. How can he survive in this
stainless steel and concrete forest when it must take fifty
thousand for the rest of these people to live in at least a
studio?
An ad. I might as well be productive and work on our company's
next ad. That's it. I'll create an ad with my lap top and be
productive sitting where I am. I don't have to chase a taxi
out there. Grow where you're planted.
First things first. The product. We want to advertise Epson
printers and computers.
The problem with computers is they're ugly. No matter what
brand you advertise, all computer hardware is ugly. You can
temporarily distract your audience with the former cast of
MASH, or Charleton Heston, but sooner or later they'll notice.
They look like the result of an unsuccessful marriage of a
typewriter and a television. Anything for a picture of people
having something to do with the computer.
Perhaps a picture of the bag man across the street. "The
computer that changed my life" he might say as he gaily looked
up from his keyboard. Unfortunately he's is sitting down on
the sidewalk against the building, unavailable for a photo
session. Must have grown tired of Citycorp's lack of response.
He's still talking to an invisible listener, feet stretched out
haphazardly. People walk around him without complaint.
"How would you like to be photographed for a newspaper ad for
an Epson computer?" I'd might ask him. "You'd be on the second
page of the financial section of the Buffalo paper. I'd need
you to sit by this machine, smiling at the results of your
laser printer's output. You need to look productive,
stimulated, satisfied, delighted that you are privileged to be
using this technology."
Back to the ad. Art really makes an ad. Where am I going to
get something with people in it. No matter what anyone says,
if you haven't got something visual, you haven't got an ad.
We've grown up with Fred Roger's puppets and the gala folks on
Sesame Street. We demand to be visually stimulated. I wonder
what Fred Rogers would have said to this bag man if he showed
up in The Land of Make Believe?
And then there are the people riding on the bus of the new
T-shirt over on the corner of the breakfast table. That's it.
Weary travelers in hopes of being successful for another day.
Why not use them? When I get back to the office,I'll photocopy
the T-shirt, run the image through the scanner, and pull it
into the ad. Even in New York I can get the creative juices
going.
I wonder if the bag man has ever heard of Epson Computers? Now
he's on his feet rummaging through a nearby trash receptacle.
He is opening bags eating left over food. Drinking out of a
discarded pop can. He probably isn't worried about diseases
because he has built up tremendous immunity. But whatever he's
had for breakfast, he didn't pay $ 2.95 for the orange juice.
OK, now the ad has a picture of the bus passengers. The
headline. It's got to be short, catchy. It's got to offer
something. The people in the drawing look like they need to be
home in an air-conditioned room with their feet up on the
chair. Nothing Epson computers has is going to change their
bus ride.
How about going from the angle of catching these people off
guard? Candid camera playing Trivial Pursuit. No relief is in
sight for these travelers, so I'll offer them a quiz game to
pass the time.
5 (of 8) ENA EDITOR Oct. 18, 1987 at 16:50 Eastern (5087 characters)
ENA NETWEAVER Volume 3, Number 10, Article 5 (October 1987)
Lap Top Publishing (Part II)
by Philip Siddons
QUICK QUIZ:
WHO IS THE LARGEST EPSON BUSINESS CENTER
IN WESTERN NEW YORK
And the most fun to deal with?
Now if the bag man across the street were buying a computer and
printer, he'd have to know something about Epson hardware. He
would also want some assurance that the people he's dealing
with are OK sort of folks. People who wouldn't turn him out or
question his credit because of his smelly clothing. People who
wouldn't come to the conclusion that he may have been released
from a mental institution with a month's supply of Thorzine and
the name of his social worker.
Below the picture I'll put some clues. The T-shirt commuters
look haggard. They don't even have the energy to respond "Who
cares!" They just want to be entertained. And readers of the
ad would trust the fatigue on the faces of the drawing and say
to themselves: "OK, a quiz! Gimme some clues." So I give some.
CLUES:
1. They (the full line Epson Computer & Printer Dealer")
carry the fabulous Epson Equity line computers.
2. They sell all of the fine quality Epson dot matrix and
laser printers.
3. They have a technical support crew who are second to
none.
4. They offer training courses and advanced consulting for
most industry standard software applications.
5. They have the friendly, competent, and accessible kind of
people you've always wanted to deal with on a
day-to-day basis.
Surely for all of the people hooked on detective novels which
demand that they recall clues, and those who thrive on
remembering facts for the Jeopardy game, or those who enjoy the
detail picking trivial games, a sense of suspense must be
mounting. Obviously the people on the bus riding across my
T-shirt don't care who is the largest Epson computer and
printer dealer in their area, but the bus ride is so boring
that they're willing to find out just to take their mind off
the monotonous ride.
Across the street there is a woman giving something to her
daughter beside her. Money. The little girl walks over to the
bag man, handing him the change. He doesn't attack. He just
puts the money in his pocket. The flow of pedestrians
continues.
Perhaps the bag man's headline and graphic is his own body
slouched on the sidewalk against Citycorp. His visual captures
the paradox of the towering height of corporate architecture
and wealth with the plummeting poverty of a street derelict
without a home, a master card, or breakfast.
Which has arrived for me. It gets put on the far side of the
table. Computer warranties don't cover damage caused by spilt
coffee, Eggs Benedict, or Manhatten souffle'.
Playing on the driving need for an answer to a quiz question, I
next appropriately include:
ANSWER
Now answers to crossword puzzles and cereal box quizzes are
usually printed upside down at the bottom. Tradition should
not be overlooked.
So I make a note to myself that when I return to my office, I
am going to scan our company logo upside down and place it at
the bottom of the ad. I'll draw an arrow from the word
"ANSWER" to the inverted logo. How many people will really
turn the ad in their paper upside down to find out the answer
to the quiz question? Everyone, of course. Anyone who has
identified with the people on the bus enough to read through
the clues to the quick quiz will have to know how this question
comes out.
This time a portly balding man comes over to the bag man and
hands him a few dollars. Was the donor a former bag man? Did
he work his way up from being a street person to chief
executive officer? This street person's campaign seems to be working. He
knows people are basically good. They respond to human need.
They'll help him guy on the street.
Perhaps his audience will take thirty seconds of their life and
read my ad about Epson printers. They'll buy them too. No one
else has bothered to stretch their imagination across their
reading material to communicate about Epson computers and
printers. But then there will be the bank ad, perhaps placed
above mine, with the cartoon figures of little people being
treated like big people at that bank. But has anyone ever gone
into a bank and felt like a big person? Certainly not the bag
man who is now urinating against the trash can which provided
his breakfast.
Why can't I have a page to myself, like this man has the
Citycorp building without competition from other derelicts?
My seminar starts in an hour and its up near Central Park.
Undoubtedly I'll pass by even more impoverished begging
campaigns. I wonder where I can get myself a good pair of
jogging shoes?
--------------------------
Author's note: Philip Siddons is the director of advertising and
marketing for a Buffalo computer firm, and is the author of
"Speaking Our For Women" (Judson) as well as various magazine
articles.
6 (of 8) ENA EDITOR Oct. 18, 1987 at 16:51 Eastern (5096 characters)
ENA NETWEAVER Volume 3, Number 10, Article 6 (October 1987)
Electronic Democracy (Part I)
by Dave Hughes
[The following comments are part of a current discussion on
'electronic democracy' taking place on DCMETA. Although many
others have responded, Dave Hughes has taken this opportunity to
share his rich experience. Through his comments we get a look at
a vibrant example of technology applied to politics.]
August 31
=========
Things are not just complex at state and national levels.
Having operated a free-dial-up computer system with a major
section devoted to public policy debate and politics with over
15,000 different individuals and over 70,000 calls to it over 5
years I am aware of how even among those already 'online' what
a relatively small proportion can/will take the time to get
into city or county matters - some of which are very complex.
*But* I also think that there can be a wholly new approach to
the concept of 'representative' governmnet. To put it
colorfully and metaphorically, we may be electing 'sysops' in
the future to represent us!!!! The very thing that Arterton
[author of a recent study of 'electronic democracy'] cites as a
problem (those who set them [systems] up want to 'set the
agenda') is a subtle signal that the person who most may be
involved is the one who is at the center of the telecom system.
Think carefully of what a role even tv anchormen and radio talk
show hosts are playing in 'setting the agenda' for many a
national or local debate.
In my own case, I am astonished at how many people come to me
to represent them using my electronic political skills. Now I
am active (Issues Chairman) of the local Democratic Party, have
a rather conspicuous reputation for my use of telecom to
challenge elected officials using just a BBS approach, yet I
get called, dialed up, visited by 4 hard-rock Republicans in
town for every Democrat to help *them* in their political
cause. Its amazing. And when I am asked to run for a variety of
offices I respond, "I don't have to - I am able to get lots of
things done without sitting up there, trapped." And there is a
Republican once-office holder who has a counterpart system
across town (and feeds editorials into a local tv station) that
is in a similar position.
So I see the possibility of significant changes in the whole
question of democracy-in-action. One example from local TV,
which is backing into it. They have a digitized telephone
service "City Line" which they promote at every newscast.
Originally started as an ad-supported dial in for suich things
as stock quotes. Anyone with a touchtone can call voice, hit
the right keys, and get what they want in voice - free.
But increasingly at the 5 o'clock news they take some hot local
issue and invite the public to dial in and vote 'yep' or 'nope'
with their key pad, and put the result on the air at 10
o'clock. For a medium town to get several thousand 'votes'
recorded on almost every issue is amazing. But it also depends
of the on-air discussion which has taken place - always led by
press figures.
Let me tell ya! They may be called 'polls' but they are
influencing policy! And it is but a tiny step from neutral
'reporting' to editorial advocacy.
Cross over to 'legal' voting? Dunno. But when I start my
Electronic Mountain Town (with Teleport) you can be sure we will
experiment with all forms of such local 'government.'
Electronic Democracy may already be here, and we just don't
want to acknowledge it. Excuse me, I gotta log onto my own
system, three local journalists are going to me me there
tonight at *my* Electronic City Hall!
Footnote on Rereading - Arterton says 'cost a lot?' Sure a lot
of over-kill types set up these elaborate sessions with live
interactive television conferencing etc. My *very* effective
political BBS that I ran for 3+ years with 50,000 calls 26,000
messages from 8,500 people cost me $8.50 a month (phone line),
an hour a day to tend, about $250 worth of repairs over three
years, running on a $1,800 micro.
Ridiculously small amount for what it did. So little that I
have been able to make the case at the city and county that
this technology can be far cheaper than the way they are doing
it now!
That's why Colorado Springs is now looking into creating their
own 'Electronic City Hall'. And I still have that micro and
software! Anybody wanna buy a used system for $500?
September 1
===========
The new City Councilman I helped elect via city BBSs has gotton
the clearance from the City Attorney to discuss everything up
to 'quasi-judicial' matters online, so long as acess to the
discussion is open to all and free. Only question will arise if
*two* or more councilpersons come into the same discussion.
Then they gotta announce it in advance like other 'meetings' !
I will give you the one, obvious reason why Qube failed. It was
based upon everyone just being able to 'vote' on public issues.
The essense of politics is *discussion*, with the final vote a
kind of necessary, legal, ritual. Qube had the ritual without
the substance!
7 (of 8) ENA EDITOR Oct. 18, 1987 at 16:52 Eastern (4154 characters)
ENA NETWEAVER Volume 3, Number 10, Article 7 (October 1987)
Electronic Democracy (Part II)
by Dave Hughes
September 4
===========
Online *everybody* gets to say their piece - whether anyone
else takes heed or not. Unlike almost any public meeting I have
attended of any size with a conroversial subject. And the
ability to 'go back again' and pick up subtle points not
grasped the first time around (heh heh I just re-read *your*
comments carefully before responding.)
But there is another dimension to this question of 'apathy'.
And that is sheer modern 'complexity' of public issues.
Frankly, a lot of public matters are so horrendously complex
and requiring more than a smattering of math, science, cultural
expertise even to understand, that it is very hard for many
(most?) in the general population to participate intelligently.
Nuclear power, air traffic safety, automobile pollution (there
is a raging debate going on on my system right now - triggered
by State Representative Renny Fagan and State Air Quality
Control Commission Member Roland Gow - over the proposed
imposition of a requirement that all gas stations sell only
'oxygenated fuel'. Lots of the public is just bedazzled by the
subject. And I, and Renny Fagan were 'attacked' online today by
a caller for our ignornace of Organic Chemistry! Lemme tell ya.
It takes a little chutzpah to argue with a Chemical Engineer -
online or off!
September 5
===========
I happen to believe that we haven't begun to scratch the
surface of the possibilites of Electronic Democracy. Almost
every 'objection' to it can be met by either technical, or information
management techniques - *very* few of which have been tried.
And remember we ought to be measuring whether or not an
Electronic Political Process is better than the one we have
now, not just whether it approaches a 'perfect' (everybody
participates-everybody votes-evryone is represented) system.
For god knows we have serious problems with the one we have
now, which has been intensified by the one-way-media form of
electronic debate. (which the FCC just helped along by removing
the requirement on TV to carry both sides of an issue)
No Sysop I know has ever set things up so that the caller can
put the Sysop (or its sponsors) through the '3d degree' before
committing themsleves to be in their 'data base.' Many is the
time I have dialed into a strange system, had all these
questions asked of me for 'registration' when I have no idea
whether I should 'trust' te sysop with my personal information
- government system or not! Sysops jsut assume that *they*
should be trusted, while grilling new users. And, with the
capbility of just about any micro/modem user (except those poor
backward souls who just use *dumb terminals* <ugh>
One can 'download' commitments, promises, answers given you by
a sysop, keep it, and take it to court with you if the need
ever arises. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act passed this
(last? - my how elecronic time flies) year gives users of
electronic means recourse at law for the misuse of ones
information entered into certain systems.
So maybe the time has come to set up 'government' BBSs so that
the new caller can - online - extract legal, binding,
commitments from the adminsitrators, or 'negotiate' what is
needed. Hey, Government, in the Electronic Age the burden will
be on *you* to prove to *me* you are worthy of my login!! Not
vice versa.
And it is far easier for government to determine
-electronically - that the caller is who they say they are and
have 'legal' standing (registered to vote, etc), than for the
individual to 'qualify' a government BBS. But quite possible at
both ends.
We just have to start thinking a-new about how to do this
within the framework of our political ideals and fundemental
system of government. Problem is that everyone has been making
the mistake futurists warn of - trying to linearly 'project'
the present methods into the future. The nation had to cope
with problems of high mobility, identification of voters in a
mobile society, absentee-voting (WWII), etc!
[continued next month!]
8 (of 8) ENA EDITOR Oct. 18, 1987 at 16:53 Eastern (1877 characters)
MEMBERSHIP FORM
On April 14, 1985, at the closing of
The First Intersystem Electronic Networking Symposium,
a new organization came into being:
the Electronic Networking Association.
The purpose of this association is
to promote electronic networking in ways that
ENRICH individuals
ENHANCE organizations
and BUILD global communities.
You are invited to become a member.
Please complete (download) the form below and _mail_ to:
Ed Yarrish, Treasurer
Electronic Networking Association
c/o Executive Technology Associates, Inc.
2744 Washington Street
Allentown, PA 18104
Enclose a check or money order made payable to the Electronic
Networking Association.
Be sure to include your network affiliations and online
addresses so that you can be informed of the location of
NETWEAVER and ENA activities on _your_ system.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ENA Membership Form
NAME: _________________________________________________
ORGANIZATION: _________________________________________________
ADDRESS: _________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
NETWORKS _________________________________________________
AND
BULLETIN _________________________________________________
BOARDS
(INCLUDE _________________________________________________
IDS, IF
NECESSARY) _________________________________________________
Amount Enclosed: _____________ ($50 - Professional membership
$20 - General membership)
Is this a new membership? _________
Net or BBS where you received this form: _____________________
Welcome!
ACTION on "NETWEAVER 3 TEN" 8 (of 8)==> (Next)
--
Patt Haring UUCP: ..cmcl2!phri!dasys1!patth
Big Electric Cat Compu$erve: 76566,2510
New York, NY, USA MCI Mail: 306-1255; GEnie: PHaring
(212) 879-9031 FidoNet Mail: 1:107/132 or 107/222