[comp.edu] Snowbird Recommendations

hubey@pilot.njin.net (Hubey) (11/27/89)

Hello

Quite recently--about a year ago--either in one of the ACM journals or
the  IEEE Computer Society journals there was a very nice and long 
article on the CS Curriculum recommendations.  

This particular article had a nice two-page spread in the form of
a table where the subareas of CS as a discipline was listed vertically
and horizontally there were columns which listed the  theory,
abstraction, and design elements comprising theses subareas.

I have spent days looking through my journals but can't find it.

Can anyone PLEASE help ??????

(It is not the January 89 issue of CACM.)


Thank you all..
mark
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 hubey@pilot.njin.net  |  hubey@apollo.montclair.edu | ...!rutgers!njin!hubey
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

rsc@altair.uucp (R. S. Cunningham) (11/30/89)

With respect to the questions:

> Quite recently--about a year ago--either in one of the ACM journals or
> the  IEEE Computer Society journals there was a very nice and long 
> article on the CS Curriculum recommendations.  
>
> This particular article had a nice two-page spread in the form of
> a table where the subareas of CS as a discipline was listed vertically
> and horizontally there were columns which listed the  theory,
> abstraction, and design elements comprising theses subareas.

I think this was, in fact, the report of the Denning committee which
attempted to define the discipline of computer science in a structured
fashion.  It was not a curriculum recommendation; this is now under
development by a joint ACM/IEEE group.  A report on this is expected at
SIGCSE (Washington, February '90).  Computer Science educators should
look this over when the next draft is released.