rickd@hcx1.SSD.HARRIS.COM (06/28/88)
Pardon me if this is naive question; LANs, and _especially_ IBM PC's are not my forte'. The question: are there any commercial realizations of the Net Bios Protocol (currently, I hear, at the RFC phase -- Request for Comment)? Net Bios is supposed to be some sort of magic that allows networked users to access a common file or DBMS with record level locking. I suppose since it's IBM-targeted that it's not layered on TCP/IP over Ethernet but some other combination. What is/would be the physical and link layers? Thanks for any info you can share, even just a pointer to somewhere else. These questions caught me completely flat-footed. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rick Davis | Written on my own behalf. Harris Computer Systems | 2101 W. Cypress Creek Rd | "Did Adam have a belly-button?" Ft. Lauderdale 33309 | (305) 973-5132 |
latzko@zydeco.rutgers.edu (Alexander Latzko) (06/28/88)
In article <94300005@hcx1> rickd@hcx1.SSD.HARRIS.COM writes: > >Pardon me if this is naive question; LANs, and _especially_ IBM PC's are >not my forte'. > >The question: are there any commercial realizations of the Net Bios >Protocol (currently, I hear, at the RFC phase -- Request for Comment)? >Rick Davis | Written on my own behalf. Sitting on my desk at the moment is a release copy of NETBIOS from FTP INC. The other versions I know of are Excelan and UB but after the last time I taked to UB their product was still in early beta. cheers /S*
lenoil@Apple.COM (Robert Lenoil) (06/29/88)
In article <94300005@hcx1> Rick Davis (rickd@hcx1.SSD.HARRIS.COM) writes: > >Pardon me if this is naive question; LANs, and _especially_ IBM PC's are >not my forte'. > >The question: are there any commercial realizations of the Net Bios >Protocol (currently, I hear, at the RFC phase -- Request for Comment)? >Net Bios is supposed to be some sort of magic that allows networked users >to access a common file or DBMS with record level locking. NetBIOS is not magic; it's an IBM-defined session level protocol (it also offers datagram service, but I digress) invented for the original IBM PC LAN. It is commercially available in IBM's (and many other vendors') PC network products. But please don't confuse file and record locking with NetBIOS; the former is provided to applications via standard DOS file system calls, and is irrespective of the underlying network. For example, AppleShare PC, a product available from Apple that allows PC workstations to access Apple file servers, fully supports the DOS file and record locking calls but does that on top of AppleTalk network protocols instead of NetBIOS. Applications don't know the difference. A small number of DOS applications bypass the file system and roll their own protocols on top of NetBIOS, but the vast majority (including all DBMS products that I know of) stick to the DOS interfaces (as recommended by Microsoft) and have nothing to do with the NetBIOS. To summarize, if file and record locking are your only concern, then you want a LAN product that is compatible with the DOS 3.1 networking calls; NetBIOS compatibility is a separate (and less important) issue. Robert Lenoil Apple Computer, Inc. Network Systems Development Group