[comp.dcom.lans] Running a LAN off the existing RJ-45 phone lines

clay@claris.UUCP (Clay A. Maeckel) (10/10/88)

In article <25288@bu-cs.BU.EDU> kwe@buit13.bu.edu (Kent England) writes:
>In article <1238@umbc3.UMD.EDU> dipto@umbc3.umd.edu (Dipto Chakravarty) writes:
>>I need some wisdom and/or recommendation on selecting a LAN that will 
>>be able to use the existing 4-conductor phone lines in the office as 
>>unshielded twisted pairs.
>
>	Finally, there is Ethernet 10BaseT.  It isn't a standard yet,
>but it will be and it will work.  It is very uncertain how well it
>will work over all installations, but if you tailor your twisted pair
>to minimize crosstalk, etc you will find that unshielded twisted pair
>Ethernet will do the job very well.  The nice thing about Ethernet is
>that TCP/IP has been running on Ethernet for years and your protocol
>problems are nonexistent.
>

At Claris we have been running quite nicely with 3Com's PairTamers. Just
put this small box on each end of a single twisted-pair and you can run
RG-58 coax out both boxes. We have run DECNet, TCP/IP, XNS, and AppleTalk
across these guys. The ethernet part of our network is shaped somewhat
like a star with 3Com's MultiConnect Repeater at the center, going to
twisted pair, coming out with coax 150 to 300 feet away from the repeater,
and chaining 1 to 4 Macs.  We are also using 3Com Ethernet boards in our
Macs.  There was a problem of mixing Sun's and Mac's at the end of run,
but putting the two Sun's at the end of their own run solved those problems.

We don't have many PC's and none with Ethernet cards but the network should
work just as well with those machines.  BTW: what is Ethernet 10BaseT, is
that the 2 twisted-pair (somewhat) standard?


-- 
 Clay Maeckel         *   UUCP: {ames,apple,portal,sun,voder}!claris!clay
 (I know nothing!)    *   Arpanet: claris!clay@ames.arc.nasa.gov
 Claris Corporation   *   AppleLink: Maeckel1   *   CompuServe: 73057,255

jbvb@ftp.COM (James Van Bokkelen) (10/12/88)

One media Kent didn't mention is Starlan (IEE 10base1, I think).
It uses 802.3 packet formats at a 1Mb data rate, and there are a
number of PC network cards which support it (AT&T, MICOM-Interlan,
Western Digital, Fox Research/DCA/10-Net).  Since most of these cards
are identical with their Ethernet version from a software point of view,
many TCP/IP packages (and proprietary LAN OSs) will run transparently.
There are also 10Mb <==> 1Mb bridges available from several vendors
(Retix and CrossCom are two that I can remember off-hand).

Another that is supposed to run on twisted pair is IBM's 4Mb Token Ring.
This is also supported by a number of hardware vendors (IBM, 3Com and
Proteon that I am sure of), and at least Netware and Vines will run on
it.  TCP/IP support is available from IBM and us (our PC/TCP).

I've never used either on existing wire - presumably most of the standard
caevats will apply; no routing near sources of electrical noise, not
too many intermediate punch-down blocks, relatively short wire runs,
relatively high-quality twsited pair to begin with (no tinsel).

James VanBokkelen
FTP Software Inc.

dave@westmark.UUCP (Dave Levenson) (10/12/88)

In article <25288@bu-cs.BU.EDU>, kwe@bu-cs.BU.EDU (kwe@bu-it.bu.edu (Kent W. England)) writes:
> In article <1238@umbc3.UMD.EDU> dipto@umbc3.umd.edu (Dipto Chakravarty) writes:
...
> >We have a 80386 box running Unix System V.3.1. Now we want to network 
> >the system with 4-5 PC AT machines running DOS applications. 
...
> 	Have I neglected any options?

You might consider AT&T Starlan.  Available in both 1 and 10 Mbit
for twisted-pair.  Supports UNIX<->MS-DOS networks, Netbios, RFS,
and such.

-- 
Dave Levenson
Westmark, Inc.		The Man in the Mooney
Warren, NJ USA
{rutgers | att}!westmark!dave

mkd@mtunh.ATT.COM (Mark Darby) (10/12/88)

In article <375@ftp.COM>, jbvb@ftp.COM (James Van Bokkelen) writes:
> One media Kent didn't mention is Starlan (IEE 10base1, I think).
> It uses 802.3 packet formats at a 1Mb data rate, and there are a
> number of PC network cards which support it (AT&T, MICOM-Interlan,
> Western Digital, Fox Research/DCA/10-Net).  Since most of these cards


Just getting the name right, the correct IEEE type for 1Mb/s 
Starlan is 1BASE5.

Mark K. Darby
AT&T Bell Laboratories
200 Laurel Ave.            
Middletown, NJ 07748      

les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell) (10/12/88)

In article <375@ftp.COM> jbvb@ftp.COM (James Van Bokkelen) writes:
>One media Kent didn't mention is Starlan (IEE 10base1, I think).
>It uses 802.3 packet formats at a 1Mb data rate, and there are a
>number of PC network cards which support it (AT&T, MICOM-Interlan,
>Western Digital, Fox Research/DCA/10-Net).  Since most of these cards
>are identical with their Ethernet version from a software point of view,
>many TCP/IP packages (and proprietary LAN OSs) will run transparently.
>There are also 10Mb <==> 1Mb bridges available from several vendors
>(Retix and CrossCom are two that I can remember off-hand).

I work with a starlan network of about 70 PC's, 7 3B2's and 7 3B1's using
the (old) AT&T software.  Much of the wiring uses existing phone line and
new runs were installed using unshielded 8-wire twisted pair.  In some
cases an analog phone line takes up one of the pairs.  We did find some
runs of old cable that would not work but generally things worked well.
One thing that makes starlan especially attractive is the ability (using
the 1Mb rate) to daisy chain up to 10 units in a single run from the hub.
We haven't tried any other protocols but are planning to switch to the
new AT&T software that uses the OSI protocol in the near future.  Bridges
to 10Mb starlan and ethernet are available.  Does anyone know what
hardware/software could be connected across such a bridge? (We are
running AT&T's RFS and netbios-emulating DOS server software on the
starlan side).

Les Mikesell