[comp.dcom.lans] National LAN Laboratory?

morgan@jessica.stanford.edu (RL "Bob" Morgan) (11/24/88)

I see in the Nov. 21 issue of Communications Week that there is now a
National Local Area Network Laboratory in Reston, Virginia.  It is a
non-profit facility that "will provide a neutral facility that
will showcase products donated from different manufacturers, as well
as an extensive library of technical information."  It is alleged that
they are expecting their first gear in January.

Anybody know anything more about this?  Are they on the net?

 - RL "Bob" Morgan
   Networking Systems
   Stanford

dbuerger@cup.portal.com (David J Buerger) (11/27/88)

I know a little about this "National LAN Lab" facility.  It has nothing
to do with the federal government.  A former journalist is trying to
get donations from major LAN manufacturers, get space to house this
equipment from DC-area universities, and get staff paid by some of the
major publications (my own is one of them) to provide a "national
resource" for interested parties to use.  Examples of users would be
publications which could test LAN equipment, special interest groups
which could test custom configurations (e.g. medical groups could test
LANs as they might apply to doctors, legal groups as LANs might pertain
to lawyers, etc.), and so forth.

To my knowledge, the LAB and its founder are not on the net.  It doesn't
exist physically, yet.  Since the board of directors consists of leading
players from the major computer publications (IDG's InfoWorld and
International Data Corp., Ziff Davis' PC Week, etc.), it's difficult
for me to understand how these competing forces can "cooperate" on such
a venture.  Ziff, for example, has its LAN Lab for PC Magazine.  InfoWorld
is presently gearing up for extensive LAN testing in its own laboratory.
It all sounds great on paper, but in the final analysis, I suspect this
"national resource" will end up like other national resources (e.g.
national parks) --- only an elite few who can afford to pay for staff
and time ultimately will benefit.

It's supposed to be up and running early next year, but I wouldn't hold
your breath. . .

David Buerger