[comp.dcom.lans] spanning tree problem

jmj@cernvax.UUCP (jmj) (04/27/89)

We have a large bridged Ethernet with about 25 segments connected directly
or  indirectly  with  MAC-level  bridges  to  one  Ethennet backbone.  The
bridges are  from  DEC  (DEBET,  revision  level  E8)  and  from  Vitalink
(TranslanIV SW version 6.9.4 and 6.9.5).  A DEBET is root with priority 32
and another DEBET is the back-up root with priority 64.  All other bridges
have default priority.

The problem is that already on three occasions the root bridge went into a
state  were  it  repeatedly initialised itself.  The first time we thought
that the root bridge had broken down, so we took it out  of  the  network,
only  to see that the back-up root started to do the same thing.  We found
that disconnecting a certain  Vitalink  bridge  stopped  the  problem  and
everything   was   fine   again   after   initialising  the  Vitalink  and
re-connecting it.  We guessed that the Vitalink decided for some reason or
the  other  to  become the root, which was of course not liked by the real
root.  The fact that  the  incriminated  Vitalink  had  also  the  highest
priority in the Vitalink domain re-enforced our suspicion.

We contacted Vitalink, who looked at the whole affair and give us a  whole
list  of reasons why DEBETs start to re-initialise themselves.  We thought
we could discard all these  reasons  apart  from  the  bad  HELLO  in  the
spanning  tree  network.  They also advised us to make the Translan bridge
the root (which we did not do, being good doctors).  Hopefully we are able
to analyse the HELLO traffic, when the problems shows up again.

Has anybody on the net had similar problems?  If so what conclusions  have
been drawn?  How about the DEC netwatcher to tell us under what conditions
a DEBET starts to initialise itself?