lamy@cs.toronto.edu (Jean-Francois Lamy) (09/09/89)
A friend who shall remain nameless working for an equally anonymous company is apparently seeking to redress some anomalous situation with respect of the assignement of the ethernet addresses for some piece of equipment they adapt or manufacture. (I promised not to implicate him :-). In short, can anyone point me (and hence him) in the right direction for guidelines/procedures for assigning ethernet addresses (and I do mean ethernet and not Internet addresses). Thanking you premat... err, in advance, Jean-Francois Lamy lamy@ai.utoronto.ca, uunet!ai.utoronto.ca!lamy AI Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Canada M5S 1A4
pat@hprnd.HP.COM (Pat Thaler) (09/19/89)
When you order a block of addresses from IEEE, the standards office sends out a letter describing in gruesome detail the relationship of the hex to bits on the wire. I presume that those who already have address blocks can ask the Standards Office for a copy of the letter. The copy I have is signed by Vincent Condello, Standards Program Manager and the subject is IEEE Assignment of a 48-Bit Globally Assigned Address Block. The address and phone number are IEEE Standards Office The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 445 Hoes Lane, P.O. Box 1331, Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331 (201) 562-3800 One reason people get confused is because 802.5 writes the hex address one way and 802.3 and 802.4 another. For any address assignment, they all send the bits on the wire in the same order. 802.3 and 802.4 define the first bit of each byte as the least significant bit. 802.5 defines it as the most significant bit. The first bit (on the wire) of the 48 bit address is the Individual/Group bit. The next bit is Universal/Local bit. The remainder of the first 3 bytes of a univeral address is the organizationally unique identifier. If you send 0000 1111 0111 0100 1010 1000 0011 0110 1110 1110 1101 1001 802.3 and .4 would call it F0 2E 15 6C 77 9B and 802.5 would call it 0F 74 A8 36 EE D9 but it is really the same address under either name. Regards, Pat Thaler