[comp.dcom.lans] WORMs and Other Options

danderer@sun.acs.udel.edu (David G Anderer) (10/06/89)

We've got a Novell LAN (SFT 2.15) supporting approximately 50 PCs used
for administration and software development.  To date we've been backing
up to 60 Mb. tapes.  That's a clumsy media.

We're also centralizing our records, code, and software retention system.
This means we'll want archival copies of lots (a gig or two) of data
on a regular basis.

I see a couple options here:

	1. Optical RW - Don't need a RW capability.
	2. 8 mm tape - Nice capacity, cheap media, but slow access.  Given
	   our so-so experience with magnetic tape I'd perfer a device
	   that looks like a DOS file system.
	3. WORM

I also see a couple of ways to configure this - as a device off the Novell
server (don't see a reason to) or attached to a workstation (where one
can just XCOPY from the server.)

So:

	Are those the options?  Anything else worth considering?

	Is WORM the best of the lot today?

	If WORM, which worm?  Reliability and support is the most
	important thing here.  (Is there a WORM format standard such
	that a disc can be transported between different vendors hw?)

	Will a WORM work nicely with DOS utilities - say as a dump device
	for Fastback?

	Is a workstation-based approach better than a server-based
	approach?

	What (if anything) is *wrong* with my thinking?

Thanks.

--
Dave Anderer
Academic Computing and Instructional Technology
University of Delaware