roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) (03/10/89)
pnessutt@nis.mn.org (Robert A. Monio) writes: > Whether these are true TCP/IP Servers or Servers that utilize TCP/IP > emulation software, I don't care. I'm not sure I understand the difference (i.e. I'm sure I don't understand the difference). What is "TCP/IP emulation software", as opposed to any other implementation of TCP/IP? Every implementation of TCP/IP that I know of (or could concieve of) is done is software. Sometimes the software is in ram and sometimes it's in rom, but it's still software. -- Roy Smith, System Administrator Public Health Research Institute {allegra,philabs,cmcl2,rutgers,hombre}!phri!roy -or- roy@phri.nyu.edu "The connector is the network"
ajudge@maths.tcd.ie (Alan Judge) (02/02/90)
We are currently investigating various sorts of TCP/IP terminal servers, and
I am looking for people's experience/advice about the best available brands.
We are in the market for 8-16 port servers initially, with expansion likely
in the future, so expandable servers are an advantage.
I currently have some information on the Emulex P4000 (16 and 32 port), and
the Spiderport 6/10/16 port.
Does anyone have any recommendations/suggestions?
Please mail to me, and I will summarise to the net.
--
Alan Judge, SysAdmin, Dept. of Maths, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
ajudge@maths.tcd.ie ajudge%maths.tcd.ie@cunyvm.cuny.edu
a.k.a
amjudge@cs.tcd.ie