[comp.dcom.lans] 10BaseT hubs

kwe@bu-it.bu.edu (Kent England) (05/26/90)

In article <784@sagpd1.UUCP>, banderso@sagpd1.UUCP (Bruce Anderson) writes:
> 
> We are starting to look at getting a couple 10BaseT hubs and I was
> wondering what companies have products available at this time.
> Currently I am aware that Cabletron Systems and David Systems both
> make products in this area and Blackbox is selling one which is
> probably the David Systems box.
> 

	At the risk of oversimplifying the market (and getting all
the vendors on my case), let me say that there is a high-end twisted
pair (UTP) hub market and a low end.

	The high end products are typically modular chassis with
multiport repeater cards (often 12 per) and some kind of an interface
card to a local backbone.  High end products offer (usually as an
option) some smarts on the backbone interface card.  Some vendors
offer proprietary network management software and some are working
on SNMP for their hubs.  Some vendors offer medium size and large
size chassis.  You could also imagine putting more horsepower on
the backbone interface card, so that you could offer bridging or
routing.  Some vendors will do that.

	The low end market is usually non-modular, with no network
management or bridging/routing and a price to match.

	You should look at Cabletron and SynOptics for the high
end.  Cabletron calls their high-end product the MMAC and SynOptics
calls theirs LattisNet.  SynOptics called earlier twisted pair
product LattisNet as well, but the earlier version will not
interoperate with Cabletron.  Later versions of both products
(I hesitate to call them 10BaseT in deference to the work of
Pat Thaler, et al on the 802.3 standards effort) interoperate-
you can plug a Cabletron transceiver into a SynOptics hub and
vice versa.  This is nice, and where 10BaseT wants to take us.

	You should consider David Systems as low end.  I'm still
researching the low end of the market, so I can't say much about
other vendors.

	I suggest you consider both high-end and low-end products
before you decide which you need.  I can see advantages to both
approaches, but what you need depends on your local network 
environment.

	Apologies to all other vendors I missed, but you may
respond for yourselves (so long as you mention a few others
at the same time :-).

	--Kent England, Boston University

alana@hprnd.HP.COM (Alan Albrecht) (05/26/90)

/ hprnd:comp.dcom.lans / banderso@sagpd1.UUCP (Bruce Anderson) / 10:32 am  May 24, 1990 /

>We are starting to look at getting a couple 10BaseT hubs and I was
>wondering what companies have products available at this time.
>--------------
>Bruce Anderson 			Scientific Atlanta - GPD
>(619) 679-6125			13112 Evening Creek Dr. South
>...!sagpd1!banderso		San Diego, CA 92128
>----------

Hewlett Packard offers two 10BaseT hubs.  The Ethertwist Hub provides
12 10BaseT ports, an AUI port and a BNC port.  The Ethertwist Hub Plus
provides the same 14 ports plus supports net management over the network.
The Hub lists for $1899 and the Hub Plus lists for $2299.  They are
available from selected dealers and direct from HP.

Alan Albrecht

haas@cs.utah.edu (Walt Haas) (05/27/90)

>We are starting to look at getting a couple 10BaseT hubs and I was
>wondering what companies have products available at this time.

We have a number of the AT&T Starlan 10 hubs.  They work fine, but
were only current at Draft 7 (if memory serves) therefore do not have
the link integrity test function.

We have looked at the more modular products, such as the Cabletron MMAC
and similar products from other vendors, but the economics aren't there
unless you really want enough smarts to run SNMP.  For a reasonably
typical Starlan installation in the College of Nursing, we have several
hubs cascaded together - plus the 15 pin port on one hub has a thinnet
transceiver supporting some machines which have only thinnet interfaces,
and the 15 pin port on the other Starlan hub has a fiber optic transceiver
supporting the link to the router in another building.  This gives us
the flexibility we need at a lower cost than the MMAC and competitors
(but admittedly with no SNMP support).

-- Walt Haas    haas@cs.utah.edu

wem@cbnewsc.att.com (william.e.mcgovern) (05/30/90)

I have been using AT&T StarLAN 10 HUBS (no surprise there) in a new building
outfitted with PDS wiring (4 twisted pairs) throughout.  I am currently
supporting two networks using 50+ hubs.  These unit do not incorporate the
Link Integrity function that the current draft addresses, but that poses
no problems for me.  I have had no problems with the units whatsoever.  I
do all the hub-to-hub and hub-to-user wiring through 110 patch panel.  This
arrangement has worked out very well for me.

				Bill McGovern
				ATTBL 45261
				att!ihc!wem
				708-305-3755