[comp.dcom.lans] PC-NFS with a NI5010 a bad pair?

MCM_Dorenbos@pttrnl.nl (M.C.M. Dorenbos, +31 70 332 5127, PTT Research, NL) (08/20/90)

We are running PC-NFS 3.01a on our ethernet. The clients are PC's with either a
NI5010 ethernet control adapter or a NI5210-16 (also known as Racal Interlan 
5120-16) ethernet control adapter. When we see a lot of traffic (more than 
15-20% measured with LTM: Lan Traffic Monitor from DEC) the PC's with the 5010
are performing really bad, the other PC's are behaving normally still.
I know that a 5010 is slower than the 5210, but I didnot know the difference
was so much, or am I missing something? What can I do to get a better
performance with the 5010 (replace them?)?

Marcel Dorenbos, PTT Research, The Netherlands.

eMail           : MCM_Dorenbos@PTTRNL.NL