[comp.dcom.lans] Wireless_Connectivity_Problem_&_A_Plea_For_Support

royce@scor_az.resp-sci.arizona.edu (Royce Robbins) (09/28/90)

Net folks,
     I have a connectivity problem.  Last year our 
Telecommunications department rewired the main campus, and a few 
of the buildings that were "close" in a politico-economic sense.  
They have provided fiber links to most buildings and copper to a 
few others.  They did not connect, nor do they intend to connect 
certain "temporary" (been there since 1920) buildings, including 
one to which I  need to be connected.
     It is not econmically feasible (T1? Sure, $750/month + 
$15000 for equipment.  Yeah, right) to lay either copper or fiber 
to this site.  I can stand on my roof and see the other building 
less than 1/2 mile away, I can literally hear them when they yell 
'Connect me! Connect me!'. They are currently connected via a 
9600baud leased line ($35+/month) that has no possibility for 
upgrade.
     My problem is: How do I connect this site at reasonable 
speed (AppleTalk speed minimum) without laying a physical 
connection?  Any ideas?  I know I am not alone in having to do 
this.  A good, inexpensive, reliable method would be met with 
great enthusiasm by a lot of peole, I'm sure.  Options I've heard 
of or looked at: 2-way lasers, microwave relays, (mucho bucks) 
packet radio (mucho slow). Anything else?

(The following is a plea for support AND 
an unpaid promotional announcement)

     One of products I found was a wireless LAN made by a group 
in Canada;

Telesystems SLW Inc.
85 Scardale Road, Suite 201
Don Mills, Ontario CANADA  M3B 2R2
(416) 441-9966
(416) 441-9785 (fax)

     They have several product lines, ranging from a wireless 
RS232 300-19200baud link to the ARLAN 600 line which is their 
"Megabit Wireless LAN".  They all use a spread-spectrum radio 
transmission technology to achieve high security and high levels 
of interference resistance.  Their products are low power 
devices, FCC certified under Part 15 in the US and DOC type 
accepted in Canada for licence-free operation.

	The specs say: Frequency: 915MHz (2.5 GHz also available);
                       Speed: Variable, 1 Mbps nominal
                       Transmit Power: up to 1 watt
                       Typical range: Indoor/Office 300' diameter
                                      Open Factory 1200' diameter
                                      Building - Building 
                                      (line of sight) 1 mile
                                 Directional antennae are available
	               Price:    about $2000, but not yet fixed

Two products are available (but won't be shipping until "4th quarter"):
  ARLAN 610 is a router that "ties into an Ethernet backbone LAN" 
            and according to the Tech I talked to would provide 
            plug'n play compatibility for Internet routing.
  ARLAN 650 is a 8-bit PC/AT compatible card that provides a fully 
            self-contained LAN communications card.  You just have 
            an antenna sticking out the back instead of a wire.

     The 650 sounds like a great product.  Think of the bucks 
you'ld save not having to lay cable (and re-lay it when users 
move!)  It's major drawback is that the only driver available is 
for Novell NetWare.  Utterly useless for a majority of 
applications.  

     Personally I think these sound like fantastic problem 
solvers, especially  for situations like mine and similiar 
situations I know to exist on this campus.  Not to mention home 
use!  I told them having a packet driver written to FTP 
Software's PC/TCP specs would open up a tremendous market.  The 
tech I spoke to said he'ld look into it.  Any other suggestions 
anyone might have would also be welcomed.

PLEA TIME:    CONTACT THIS COMPANY!

If anybody else agrees with me please CONTACT THIS COMPANY!  Let 
them know there is a market out there (I KNOW I'm not alone) AND 
that most of the world wants something other than Novell (like 
TCP/IP).  End of plea.

     Oh yeah, if anyone has any OTHER ideas, let me know.  Thanks!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Royce Robbins                         INTERNET: royce@resp-sci.arizona.edu
Div Resp Sciences                          FAX: (602) 626-4884
UofArizona                               PHONE: (602) 626-5022
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

vtcqa@shamash.cdc.com (Jeff Comstock) (09/28/90)

> packet radio (mucho slow) .....

Maybe these systems aren't considered packet radio, but
there has been work done by Amateur Radio operators using
'arcnet' ( 1 mbps ) cards on 10 gHz, and I have heard
that Bdale Garbee has done 10 mbps over the radio too.

The 1 mbps system was explained in great detail, schematics
and everything in the December 1989 issue of Ham Radio 
magazine.  That system could be slapped together for 
probably (alot) less than 200 dollars. It was designed
to use KA9Q TCP/IP.  

If you are interested in contacting these people, send me
email and I will dig up some mail addresses for you.

Jeff 

nelson@sun.soe.clarkson.edu (Russ Nelson) (09/29/90)

In article <141@organpipe.UUCP> royce@scor_az.resp-sci.arizona.edu (Royce Robbins) writes:

        One of products I found was a wireless LAN made by a group 
   in Canada ...

   I told them having a packet driver written to FTP Software's PC/TCP
   specs would open up a tremendous market.

I gave them a call, and offered a free packet driver in return for a
donation of two PC cards to Clarkson.  They said that they like to be
paid for these kinds of things, and they have a developer's kit for
sale also.  They admitted as how they might be able to make some
accomodation for my case, however.  They said they'd call me back.

Frankly, I don't have the time to waste begging them.  I've got lots
of other packet drivers to write.  However, if you think they've got a
solution for you, call them up and explain how much you like Clarkson
packet drivers...  :-)

--
--russ (nelson@clutx [.bitnet | .clarkson.edu])  Russ.Nelson@$315.268.6667
It's better to get mugged than to live a life of fear -- Freeman Dyson

rpw3@rigden.wpd.sgi.com (Rob Warnock) (09/30/90)

In article <141@organpipe.UUCP> royce@scor_az.resp-sci.arizona.edu
(Royce Robbins) writes:
+---------------
| I have a connectivity problem... One of products I found was a wireless
| LAN made by a group in Canada... Telesystems SLW Inc...
| Two products are available (but won't be shipping until "4th quarter"):
|   ARLAN 610 is a router that "ties into an Ethernet backbone LAN" 
|   ARLAN 650 is a 8-bit PC/AT... card that provides a fully self-contained...
+---------------

Back in April of this year, Dave Farber <farber@linc.cis.upenn.edu> wrote
in this forum:

+---------------
| We, at UPenn, are in the final stages of putting our local magnet high school
| of engineering and science -- the George Washington Carver High School in
| Philadelphia onto the internet via a spread spectrum radio link operating
| license free at 900 mh. 
+---------------

Inquiring, I got back mail from Al Broscius <broscius@cis.upenn.edu>, who said:

+---------------
| The current Spread Spectrum Packet Radio system being deployed is manufactured
| by Telesystems SLW of Toronto, CA and complies with FCC 15.126 rules (now
| moved to 15.247).   The card, named the ARLAN 450, is a PC/XT adapter which
| has a 902-928 MHz 230 kbps transceiver and a Z80 for on-board processing.
| The outside world is connected via a "TNC"-style RF jack (similar to a
| BNC but threaded).
| 
| The antennas we're currently using ar 18.6 dBi 33-elt loop yagis from
| Down East Microwave in Maine.  Software is KA9Q NOS with a custom
| packet driver built from the Clarkson kit plus the supplied Novell
| driver and some UPenn-originated glue code.
+---------------

And in later mail, Al said:

+---------------
| The radio cards go for $1500 each in unit quantity.  They have a 230 kbps
| channel rate.
| 
| The loop yagi beams cost $109 each and should give the system a range
| in excess of our target 3 miles.  I'd be a little hesitant about claiming
| 20 miles (very hesitant, actually).
+---------------

1. I'd be very interested in hearing an update from the UPenn folk on how
   things are going, and whether the deployment of this system has been
   easy, hard, aborted, or whatever.

2. It looks like the ARLAN 600 series products are shooting for the more
   "productized" or "plug-n-play" market. The ARLAN 450 UPenn used might
   be more for the technically more adventuresome ["...UPenn-originated
   glue code..."]. But it sounds like it was available earlier.

3. Maybe Telesystems SLW Inc. just hasn't decided what market they want
   to be in. (?)


-Rob

-----
Rob Warnock, MS-9U/510		rpw3@sgi.com		rpw3@pei.com
Silicon Graphics, Inc.		(415)335-1673		Protocol Engines, Inc.
2011 N. Shoreline Blvd.
Mountain View, CA  94039-7311