[comp.dcom.lans] Pros/Cons: Leased line vs. Alternet vs. ?

mark@intek01.uucp (Mark McWiggins) (03/31/91)

My prospective employer has a leased line from WA to CA to carry
56k bps traffic.  I've seen the announcement of UUNET's Alternet
service, which would seem to be an option for them.  Has anyone
out in Netland made this switch?  Did it work for you?

Are there any other alternatives a company looking to do such a thing
should know about?

Thanks in advance for any insight.
-- 
Mark McWiggins			Integration Technologies, Inc. (Intek)
+1 206 455 9935			DISCLAIMER:  I could be wrong ...
1400 112th Ave SE #202		Bellevue WA  98004
mark@intek.com    		Ask me about C++!

vances@xenitec.on.ca (Vance Shipley) (04/03/91)

Depending on the nature of your traffic you might consider a Switched 56K
service.  If you need high speed file transfers but not a constant connection
then it could be the ticket.  In effect what Switched 56K service is is a
special kind of modem that allows 56,000 bit per second connections.

Sprint has it, AT&T has it, MCI say they do.

Vance Shipley
vances@xenitec
..!uunet!watmath!xenitec!vances