[comp.cog-eng] knobs vs buttons

bob@tinman.cis.ohio-state.edu (Bob Sutterfield) (06/30/89)

Yesterday afternoon was the first blue-sky day in months, and it would
have been both criminal and immoral to spend the day in the office,
let alone on the ground.  So I took an officemate for his first light
aircraft ride, which he generally enjoyed.

In the car on the way home we discussed more specifics about the
contents of the panel.  Why, he wondered, are all radio frequency
selectors knobs (often concentric, sometimes with different meanings
when they're pulled out a notch) rather than keypads?

My best answer was "to save panel acreage", which is a premium
commodity in better-equipped small aircraft.  However, it seems that
even in higher-priced systems for larger panels like the new Honeywell
gizmo box that I see advertised in Flying, frequency selection is
still accomplished with concentric knobs.  Keypads don't seem to be
used until you get into LORAN-coupled moving map displays, where you
need to type in intersections, waypoints, etc. and mere knobs wouldn't
suffice.  And some of those aren't intended to fit into the panel,
anyway - the "console" has a cable and rests on your lap.

So is panel acreage the only reason?  Or are there other user
interface considerations that override the apparent superiority of a
general-purpose keypad over lots of specific knobs?