ppolson@clipr.colorado.edu (07/14/90)
CHI'91 Technical Papers Program CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS From the general CHI'91 Call for Participation ... "The annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems is the leading forum for bringing together the wide variety of people concerned with the different aspects of human interaction with computing systems: analysts, engineers, applied researchers, basic researchers, managers, teachers, and students. And, the CHI community expresses interest in all phases of technology development and use: research, requirements analysis, innovation, exploratory development, design, prototyping, full-scale development, deployment, usage and social impact. The CHI conference activities and the publications that come from it provide a number of vehicles for communicating the latest thinking on these issues." TECHNICAL PAPERS Technical papers present new theoretical work, empirical results, or studies of the design process relating to a significant problem in computer-human interaction. Reviews that provide fresh approaches to the organization and integrating of knowledge in a particular topic area are encouraged. Studies of the design process and descriptions of applications should clearly describe their innovative elements, their underlying conceptual motivations, and the lesson leaned that generalize to other systems and settings that led to their development. Papers dealing with methodological foundations must have explicit objectives and conclusions. Papers will be selected on the basis of originality, the significance of their contribution to the state of the art, methodological rigor (where applicable), citation of relevant literature, and quality of the written presentation. Each paper will be reviewed by three experts in the field. The reviews will then be evaluated by a subcommittee of the Papers Committee led by one of the associate chairs listed below. The final decision to accept papers will be made by the Committee as a whole. TOPICS USER-INTERFACE DESIGN ISSUES Jim Miller, HP Labs intelligent interfaces; adaptive systems; natural language interfaces; auditory, visual and motor input/output devices and strategies; interface metaphors; graphic presentations, screen layout; ergonomic design of technology in workplaces; standards SYSTEM DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTATION, AND USE John Bennett, IBM system solutions to human factors requirements; the design process; involving users in design; implementation methods; documentation; impact on worklife and organizations DEVELOPMENT TOOLS AND METHODS Jim Foley, GWU user interface toolkits; UIMSs (user interface management systems); rapid prototyping; programmer assistants; design notations; design methods ANALYSIS METHODS Juergen Ziegler, Fraunhofer task analysis; function analysis; interaction analysis; discourse and other linguistic analyses; analysis of contents of particular domains; usability testing MODELS OF THE USER Richard Young, APU models of user learning; models of user performance; mental models (models the user has of how the system works); the change in user knowledge with experience; individual differences DOMAIN SPECIFIC DESIGNS John Gould, IBM intelligent tutoring systems; CAD/CAM; programming; software psychology; expert systems; information retrieval; decision aids; creative arts; aids for the impaired; hypertext GROUP WORK John Whiteside, DEC observational studies; domain specific designs; user interface design issues; development issues; impact studies of the use of groupware MANAGING HUMAN FACTORS IN SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT Susan Rudman, USWest where human factors fits in various stages of product development life-cycle; cost/benefit analysis; staffing for human factors; centralized/decentralized placement of human factors in an organization OTHER (please supply details) Stuart Card, Xerox PARC INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION ****NO FAX SUBMISSIONS**** DEADLINE: OCTOBER 1, 1990 Send SIX copies of a packet that includes the cover sheet (described below) and the paper to: Peter Polson CHI'91 Technical Papers Chair Department of Psychology Campus Box 345 University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80809-0345 Phone: (303) 492-5622. INTERNET:ppolson@clipr.colorado.edu. BITNET:ppolson%CLIPR@VAXF.Colorado.EDU The cover sheet MUST have the following information: Title Name(s) and affiliations of author(s) Kind of Activity: Paper Postal and electronic addresses and phone number of person to whom correspondence should be addressed. Topic area: Use at least one of the major topic headings listed above. Include second major topic area, if appropriate, as well as additional key words. 100 word abstract. Word count of the text. A list of other activities this submission is related to, if it is part of a coordinated set. Acceptable presentation format: traditional oral presentation, panel, other innovative format, or any. Papers must be written in English and may not exceed 3,000 words in length. Exceptions are review papers that integrate a significant body of work which may be up to 4,000 words in length. Such papers will be judged by higher standards. Accepted papers will be published in the conference proceedings and authors will be required to sign the ACM Copyright Release Form. Late papers, papers that exceed the 3,000 (or in the case of review papers, the 4,000) word limit, and papers that omit the requested cover sheet information will not be reviewed. PRESENTATION FORMAT One of the major innovations that has been instituted for CHI'91 is a decoupling of published papers from the format of their presentation at the convention. In past years, all published papers were presented at the CHI Conference in a 20 minute lecture format. The number of papers that could be published was in part determined by the amount of time devoted to their presentation at the conference. This year the Committee, with the consent of the authors, will suggest alternative forms of presentation for papers at the actual convention. For example, a group of related papers could be presented as a panel. The authors of a paper describing in an innovative system might be asked to demo their program at the convention. Papers published in the proceedings could be presented as posters at the convention. Finally, it is possible for a group of collaborators to propose that a related set of activities be presented together during one session. For example, a demo could be combined with a panel and two papers. MORE INFORMATION ON MAKING SUCCESSFUL SUBMISSIONS Last year, the Papers Committee was able to accept approximately 20% of the submissions. Thus, getting your paper accepted is an extremely competitive process. Reviewers have to evaluate ten or more papers on an "as is" basis. There is no time for the normal revision cycle that occurs when submitting a paper to a refereed journal. Thus, the kind of flaws in presentation involving writing style or difficult to understand figures that can be easily fixed in the typical journal review process are cause for rejection of CHI submissions. Papers that are close to their final camera-ready form have an advantage in the reviewing process because a reviewer can more easily evaluate both content and appearence of your paper. Authors are encouraged to consult previous CHI conference proceedings for information about detail of the camera-ready format. The best way to evaluate your submission is to try to put yourself in the role of a reviewer. Ask yourself the following questions about the content and appearance of your paper. 1. Will the goals of your paper be clear to your reader? 2. Will your reader consider the results presented in your paper to be both informative and important? 3. Is the logic underlying your arguments clear? Are the empirical and statistical methods used sound? 4. Does the writing style make your ideas and results clear to the reader? 5. Can the content of your paper be effectively presented in 6 to 7 pages in the Proceedings taking account of the length of the text, figures, and references? MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CHI'91 CONFERENCE CHI'91 will be April 28 through May 2, 1991 in New Orleans. If you have any general questions about the CHI conference or are interested in contributing to the conference in an other manner besides a paper (demo, video, panel, poster, etc.), please contact the CHI'91 Executive Administrator and ask for the general Call for Participation: June Davis Phone: (301) 269-6801 Conference and Logistics Consultants 13 Annapolis Street Annapolis, MD 21401
ppolson@clipr.colorado.edu (07/14/90)
CHI'91 Technical Papers Program CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS From the general CHI'91 Call for Participation ... "The annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems is the leading forum for bringing together the wide variety of people concerned with the different aspects of human interaction with computing systems: analysts, engineers, applied researchers, basic researchers, managers, teachers, and students. And, the CHI community expresses interest in all phases of technology development and use: research, requirements analysis, innovation, exploratory development, design, prototyping, full-scale development, deployment, usage and social impact. The CHI conference activities and the publications that come from it provide a number of vehicles for communicating the latest thinking on these issues." TECHNICAL PAPERS Technical papers present new theoretical work, empirical results, or studies of the design process relating to a significant problem in computer-human interaction. Reviews that provide fresh approaches to the organization and integrating of knowledge in a particular topic area are encouraged. Studies of the design process and descriptions of applications should clearly describe their innovative elements, their underlying conceptual motivations, and the lesson leaned that generalize to other systems and settings that led to their development. Papers dealing with methodological foundations must have explicit objectives and conclusions. Papers will be selected on the basis of originality, the significance of their contribution to the state of the art, methodological rigor (where applicable), citation of relevant literature, and quality of the written presentation. Each paper will be reviewed by three experts in the field. The reviews will then be evaluated by a subcommittee of the Papers Committee led by one of the associate chairs listed below. The final decision to accept papers will be made by the Committee as a whole. TOPICS USER-INTERFACE DESIGN ISSUES Jim Miller, HP Labs intelligent interfaces; adaptive systems; natural language interfaces; auditory, visual and motor input/output devices and strategies; interface metaphors; graphic presentations, screen layout; ergonomic design of technology in workplaces; standards SYSTEM DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTATION, AND USE John Bennett, IBM system solutions to human factors requirements; the design process; involving users in design; implementation methods; documentation; impact on worklife and organizations DEVELOPMENT TOOLS AND METHODS Jim Foley, GWU user interface toolkits; UIMSs (user interface management systems); rapid prototyping; programmer assistants; design notations; design methods ANALYSIS METHODS Juergen Ziegler, Fraunhofer task analysis; function analysis; interaction analysis; discourse and other linguistic analyses; analysis of contents of particular domains; usability testing MODELS OF THE USER Richard Young, APU models of user learning; models of user performance; mental models (models the user has of how the system works); the change in user knowledge with experience; individual differences DOMAIN SPECIFIC DESIGNS John Gould, IBM intelligent tutoring systems; CAD/CAM; programming; software psychology; expert systems; information retrieval; decision aids; creative arts; aids for the impaired; hypertext GROUP WORK John Whiteside, DEC observational studies; domain specific designs; user interface design issues; development issues; impact studies of the use of groupware MANAGING HUMAN FACTORS IN SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT Susan Rudman, USWest where human factors fits in various stages of product development life-cycle; cost/benefit analysis; staffing for human factors; centralized/decentralized placement of human factors in an organization OTHER (please supply details) Stuart Card, Xerox PARC INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMISSION ****NO FAX SUBMISSIONS**** DEADLINE: OCTOBER 1, 1990 Send SIX copies of a packet that includes the cover sheet (described below) and the paper to: Peter Polson CHI'91 Technical Papers Chair Department of Psychology Campus Box 345 University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309-0345 Phone: (303) 492-5622. INTERNET:ppolson@clipr.colorado.edu. BITNET:ppolson%CLIPR@VAXF.Colorado.EDU The cover sheet MUST have the following information: Title Name(s) and affiliations of author(s) Kind of Activity: Paper Postal and electronic addresses and phone number of person to whom correspondence should be addressed. Topic area: Use at least one of the major topic headings listed above. Include second major topic area, if appropriate, as well as additional key words. 100 word abstract. Word count of the text. A list of other activities this submission is related to, if it is part of a coordinated set. Acceptable presentation format: traditional oral presentation, panel, other innovative format, or any. Papers must be written in English and may not exceed 3,000 words in length. Exceptions are review papers that integrate a significant body of work which may be up to 4,000 words in length. Such papers will be judged by higher standards. Accepted papers will be published in the conference proceedings and authors will be required to sign the ACM Copyright Release Form. Late papers, papers that exceed the 3,000 (or in the case of review papers, the 4,000) word limit, and papers that omit the requested cover sheet information will not be reviewed. PRESENTATION FORMAT One of the major innovations that has been instituted for CHI'91 is a decoupling of published papers from the format of their presentation at the convention. In past years, all published papers were presented at the CHI Conference in a 20 minute lecture format. The number of papers that could be published was in part determined by the amount of time devoted to their presentation at the conference. This year the Committee, with the consent of the authors, will suggest alternative forms of presentation for papers at the actual convention. For example, a group of related papers could be presented as a panel. The authors of a paper describing in an innovative system might be asked to demo their program at the convention. Papers published in the proceedings could be presented as posters at the convention. Finally, it is possible for a group of collaborators to propose that a related set of activities be presented together during one session. For example, a demo could be combined with a panel and two papers. MORE INFORMATION ON MAKING SUCCESSFUL SUBMISSIONS Last year, the Papers Committee was able to accept approximately 20% of the submissions. Thus, getting your paper accepted is an extremely competitive process. Reviewers have to evaluate ten or more papers on an "as is" basis. There is no time for the normal revision cycle that occurs when submitting a paper to a refereed journal. Thus, the kind of flaws in presentation involving writing style or difficult to understand figures that can be easily fixed in the typical journal review process are cause for rejection of CHI submissions. Papers that are close to their final camera-ready form have an advantage in the reviewing process because a reviewer can more easily evaluate both content and appearence of your paper. Authors are encouraged to consult previous CHI conference proceedings for information about detail of the camera-ready format. The best way to evaluate your submission is to try to put yourself in the role of a reviewer. Ask yourself the following questions about the content and appearance of your paper. 1. Will the goals of your paper be clear to your reader? 2. Will your reader consider the results presented in your paper to be both informative and important? 3. Is the logic underlying your arguments clear? Are the empirical and statistical methods used sound? 4. Does the writing style make your ideas and results clear to the reader? 5. Can the content of your paper be effectively presented in 6 to 7 pages in the Proceedings taking account of the length of the text, figures, and references? MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE CHI'91 CONFERENCE CHI'91 will be April 28 through May 2, 1991 in New Orleans. If you have any general questions about the CHI conference or are interested in contributing to the conference in an other manner besides a paper (demo, video, panel, poster, etc.), please contact the CHI'91 Executive Administrator and ask for the general Call for Participation: June Davis Phone: (301) 269-6801 Conference and Logistics Consultants 13 Annapolis Street Annapolis, MD 21401
ppolson@clipr.colorado.edu (08/31/90)
PLEASE DISTRIBUTE COPIES OF THIS NOTICE TO POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTORS TO THE CHI'91 TECHNICAL PAPERS PROGRAM CHI'91 Technical Papers Program BRIEF CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS Technical papers present new theoretical work, empirical results, methodological foundations, or studies of the design process relating to a significant problem in computer-human interaction. ****NO FAX SUBMISSIONS**** DEADLINE: OCTOBER 1, 1990 ANYONE PLANNING TO SUBMIT A PAPER IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO OBTAIN A COPY OF THE DETAILED CALL FOR PAPERS Send SIX copies of a packet that includes the cover sheet and your paper to Peter Polson, CHI'91 Technical Papers Chair. Detailed information about the required content of the cover sheet and the content and format of your paper can be obtained by USMail or e-mail or by phone. US Mail: Peter Polson CHI'91 Technical Papers Chair Department of Psychology Campus Box 345 University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309-0345 Phone: (303) 492-5622 FAX: (303) 492-2967 E-mail: INTERNET:chi91@boulder.colrado.edu polson@boulder.colorado.edu. polson.chi@xerox.com ppolson@clipr.colorado.edu. BITNET:ppolson%CLIPR@VAXF.Colorado.EDU PLEASE DISTRIBUTE COPIES OF THIS NOTICE TO POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTORS TO THE CHI'91 TECHNICAL PAPERS PROGRAM