daveb@geac.UUCP (11/02/87)
| In article <16064@topaz.rutgers.edu>, ron@topaz.rutgers.edu (Ron Natalie) writes: || Foo. Note that twisted pair Ethernet is a kludge. This high-speed || (Radio Frequency) unshielded twisted pair stuff is going to be put || to an end as this stuff is not going to comply with FCC regulations || on emissions. In article <2174@kitty.UUCP> larry@kitty.UUCP writes: | Actually, I don't believe that the FCC can do much about it. The | Ethernet transceivers certainly meet FCC emission requirements when used | in a proper manner with coaxial cable (as intended). | ... Wanna see something neat? Try running two separate Ethernet | circuits any significant distance in multi-pair telephone cable using | these balun transformers. Methinks the persons installing and using these kludges are going to have some explaining to do about all the QRM they're producing: The US FCC or our DOT may type-approve transmitters, but hams still get snarled at when they misuse them to the detriment of others. -- David Collier-Brown. {mnetor|yetti|utgpu}!geac!daveb Geac Computers International Inc., | Computer Science loses its 350 Steelcase Road,Markham, Ontario, | memory (if not its mind) CANADA, L3R 1B3 (416) 475-0525 x3279 | every 6 months.