[comp.dcom.modems] Spurious { on 2400 baud line

wtm@neoucom.UUCP (Bill Mayhew) (11/27/87)

The modem noise seen at 2400 baud nearly always affects two
adjacent characters.  This is due to the fact that a scrambler
circuit is used to encode the outgoing characters.  The reason a
scrambler is used is to ensure that the phase modulation used is
more-or-less spread out evenly across all four possible phase
angles, and that the line is busy continuously so that the
receiver's demodulator can stay in sync.

I have experineced increased incidence of noise when a call passes
though a digital switching circuit.  What seems to happen is that
there are small time shifts due to the quantization of the modem
signal as it passes though the digital switch.  The time shifts
introduced by the switch are tantamount phase modulation and thus
produce extraneous caharacters at the receiver.  There really isn't
much that can be done to remedy the problem, unless you find a
cooperative person at the telephone company.  Priveately owned
digital branch exchanges are even more of a problem, as the
installers often do not have technical expertise to understand your
problem and invariably blame the modem.

Note that the telephone company is under no obligation to give you
anything better than a line that is acceptible for carrying a voice
call (unless you have a leased data line).  Minor phase shifts
don't seem to affect voice calls but do drive modems crazy.

When the phone company in the area where I live switched over to T1
circuits between central offices, we had terrible modem noise for a
while.  This is due to the fact that the T1 lines were operated at
a raw rate of 64K bits per second.  Of that, 8K bits per second is
used for telco supervisory stuff.  That leaves 56K bits per second
for the data.  There was a problem where the time shift created by
the removal of the supervisory data blocks was not being handled
correctly, thus resulting in modem noise.  The phone compnay
eventaully did fix the problem.

One thing to notice when sluething modem noise problems is which
end, if any is more seriously affected.  Under normal
circumstances, when a host answers, it sends out a 2400 Hz carrier
and listens for a 1200 Hz carrier from the person calling in.  It
seems that more often than not, there is high frequency attenuation
on phone lines (that is to say, greater than normal high frequncy
attenuation).  This means that typically the person calling in will
see more noise than the host does.  Under such circumstances,
equalization of the line will help.  Essentially the same reasoning
as putting a grphic equalizer on a stereo is employed, in that a
"flat" frequecny response is better.

I have problems with a particualy bad line between my computer,
impulse, and the next nearest node, neoucom.  I couldn't get the
phone comany to equalize the line.  Since impulse is on a
residential line, the phone compnay isn't terribly sympathetic.  I
can understand their position.  I think if you have a business
line, you might get a little more attention from Ma Bell.  My
solution was to get a Telebit Trailblazer.  Cleaning up 1200 bps
calls wasn't really why I got the T. T., but it was a fringe
benefit.  The T. T. apparently has a built-in equalizer which it
seemingly uses even on low speed calls.  I had tried a real Hayes
and several other compatibles on that line and had never been able
to get even a login: on neoucom.

I don't really want to provide a free plug for Telebit, so I should
mention that any modem that has equalization would improve the
quality of the connection.  Also, equalization is not sufficient to
cure time slippage problems introduced by digitial switching
equipment.  If possilbe, host modems should have lines that don't
go though pbx systems.

One other solution is to get modems that have NMP error correction.
NMP does a 2:1 data compression as well as error correction.  It is
lik having a 4800 baud line.  NMP is only effective if both ends of
the conversation have modems with the capability.  Supporting
random Joe Any User is a problem, but at least you can issue a
disclaimer that if Joe wants a clean call, he'll have to get an NMP
modem.

Hope this helps,

Bill Mayhew
(wtm@neoucom.UUCP)  or
...![cbosgd|mandrill]!neoucom!wtm  or
...![cobogd|mandrill]!neoucom!impulse!wtm