glass@soda.Berkeley.EDU (02/22/91)
We are about to purchase some PP9600SAs to run slip. Both ends of the
connections will be PPs. Has anyone tried this configuration? Does
it work? Are there any problems we should know about? And where can
half a dozen relatively cheaply?
later,
Adam Glass
UC Berkeley
----------
Adam Glass |Internet: glass@soda.Berkeley.EDU
various roles at Berkeley |UUCP: ...!ucbvax!soda!glass
|Home: glass@Chaos.orgglass@soda.Berkeley.EDU (238E) (02/22/91)
We are about to purchase some PP9600SAs to run slip. Both ends of the connections will be PPs. Has anyone tried this configuration? Does it work? Are there any problems we should know about? And where can half a dozen or more relatively cheaply? later, Adam Glass UC Berkeley ---------- Adam Glass |Internet: glass@soda.Berkeley.EDU various roles at Berkeley |UUCP: ...!ucbvax!soda!glass |Home: glass@Chaos.org -- Adam Glass |Internet: glass@soda.Berkeley.EDU various roles at Berkeley |UUCP: ...!ucbvax!soda!glass |Home: glass@Chaos.org
larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder) (02/25/91)
glass@soda.Berkeley.EDU writes: >We are about to purchase some PP9600SAs to run slip. Both ends of the >connections will be PPs. Has anyone tried this configuration? Does >it work? Are there any problems we should know about? And where can >half a dozen relatively cheaply? I would suggest canning the PP modems and going with v.32bis - you'll get a 50% increase in throughput -- -- Larry Snyder, NSTAR Public Access Unix 219-289-0287 (HST/PEP/V.32/v.42bis) regional UUCP mapping coordinator {larry@nstar.rn.com, ..!uunet!nstar.rn.com!larry}