bill@twwells.uucp (T. William Wells) (05/02/89)
I've so far received over a hundred of the following. Somebody want
to try to explain just what went wrong?
I'm trying to limit the damage by preventing the forwarding of the
mail to uflorida.
I'm not about to send any mail on this one, I might create more of the
same!
---
Bill { uunet | novavax } !twwells!bill
The X. file:
U uucp proxftl
F D.twwellsB0d69
I D.twwellsB0d69
C rmail novavax!uflorida!mailer-daemon
The D. file:
From novavax!hcx1!uunet!mimsy!ames!mailrus!gatech!ukma!gatech!mailrus!ames!pyramid!mailer-daemon Mon May 1 22:55:06 1989 remote from proxftl
Received: from novavax.UUCP by (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA03959; Mon, 1 May 89 22:55:06 EDT
Received: by novavax.UUCP (smail2.5)
id AA17072; 1 May 89 22:04:38 EDT (Mon)
Received: by hcx1.SSD.HARRIS.COM (smail2.5)
id AA28550; 1 May 89 21:14:16 EDT (Mon)
Received: from mimsy.UUCP by uunet.uu.net (5.61/1.14) with UUCP
id AA23072; Mon, 1 May 89 20:13:13 -0400
Received: by mimsy.UMD.EDU (smail2.5)
id AA28610; 1 May 89 20:07:37 EDT (Mon)
Received: by ames.arc.nasa.gov (5.61/1.2); Mon, 1 May 89 17:12:07 -0700
Received: from gatech.edu by mailrus.cc.umich.edu (5.59/1.0)
id AA07643; Mon, 1 May 89 20:11:15 EDT
Received: from ukma.UUCP with UUCP by gatech.edu (5.58/GATECH-8.6)
id AA22200 for ; Mon, 1 May 89 19:50:33 EDT
Received: from gatech.edu by g.ms.uky.edu id aa05072; 1 May 89 23:31 GMT
Received: from mailrus.UUCP with UUCP by gatech.edu (5.58/GATECH-8.6)
id AA21380 for ; Mon, 1 May 89 19:11:04 EDT
Received: from ames.arc.nasa.gov by mailrus.cc.umich.edu (5.59/1.0)
id AA29144; Sun, 30 Apr 89 19:14:28 EDT
Received: by ames.arc.nasa.gov (5.61/1.2); Sun, 30 Apr 89 16:14:25 -0700
Received: by pyramid.pyramid.com (5.61/OSx4.4c-890312)
id AB24671; Sun, 30 Apr 89 15:39:24 -0700
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 89 15:39:24 -0700
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <proxftl!uunet!ames!mailrus!gatech!ms.uky.edu!gatech!mailrus!ames!pyramid.pyramid.com!MAILER-DAEMON>
Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail
Message-Id: <8904302239.AB24671@pyramid.pyramid.com>
To: hcx1!novavax!proxftl!twwells!novavax!uflorida!mailer-daemon
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 sendall: too many hops (17 max)
----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by pyramid.pyramid.com (5.61/OSx4.4c-890312)
id AA24671; Sun, 30 Apr 89 15:39:24 -0700
Received: by ames.arc.nasa.gov (5.61/1.2); Sun, 30 Apr 89 15:39:26 -0700
Received: by mailrus.cc.umich.edu (5.59/1.0)
id AA28392; Sun, 30 Apr 89 18:24:13 EDT
Received: from s.ms.uky.edu by g.ms.uky.edu id aa05361; 30 Apr 89 22:07 GMT
Received: from e.ms.uky.edu by s.ms.uky.edu id aa29977; 30 Apr 89 22:06 GMT
Received: from g.ms.uky.edu by g.ms.uky.edu id aa28150; 30 Apr 89 22:04 GMT
Received: from gatech.edu by g.ms.uky.edu id aa05259; 30 Apr 89 22:03 GMT
Received: from mailrus.UUCP with UUCP by gatech.edu (5.58/GATECH-8.6)
id AA29014 for ; Sun, 30 Apr 89 17:39:23 EDT
Received: from ames.arc.nasa.gov by mailrus.cc.umich.edu (5.59/1.0)
id AA00383; Fri, 28 Apr 89 23:29:04 EDT
Received: by ames.arc.nasa.gov (5.61/1.2); Fri, 28 Apr 89 19:49:11 -0700
Received: by mimsy.UMD.EDU (smail2.5)
id AA18451; 28 Apr 89 22:43:29 EDT (Fri)
Received: from hcx1.UUCP by uunet.uu.net (5.61/1.14) with UUCP
id AA20993; Fri, 28 Apr 89 22:37:49 -0400
Received: by hcx1.SSD.HARRIS.COM (smail2.5)
id AA08903; 28 Apr 89 21:38:30 EDT (Fri)
Received: by novavax.UUCP (smail2.5)
id AA00528; 28 Apr 89 20:15:01 EDT (Fri)
Received: from twwells.UUCP by (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA26721; Fri, 28 Apr 89 19:41:26 EDT
Received: by twwells.uucp (smail2.5)
id AA25198; 28 Apr 89 18:40:39 EST (Fri)
Received: by novavax.UUCP (smail2.5)
id AA28384; 28 Apr 89 18:00:32 EDT (Fri)
Received: by bikini.cis.ufl.edu (5.61ufl/2.22)
id AB15899; Fri, 28 Apr 89 16:56:53 -0400
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 89 16:56:53 -0400
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <ames!mailrus!ms.uky.edu!gatech.uucp!mailrus!uunet!proxftl!uflorida!MAILER-DAEMON>
Subject: Returned mail: Unable to deliver mail
Message-Id: <8904282056.AB15899@bikini.cis.ufl.edu>
To: mailrus!ms.uky.edu!mimsy.uucp!ames!mailrus!ukma!e.ms.uky.edu!s.ms.uky.edu!ukma.uucp!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus.cc.umich.edu!b-tech.uucp!m-net!m2-net!luitje
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 sendall: too many hops (17 max)
----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by bikini.cis.ufl.edu (5.61ufl/2.22)
id AA15899; Fri, 28 Apr 89 16:56:53 -0400
Received: by novavax.UUCP (smail2.5)
id AA24903; 28 Apr 89 14:38:22 EDT (Fri)
Received: by twwells.uucp (smail2.5)
id AA22389; 28 Apr 89 08:11:39 EST (Fri)
Received: from novavax.UUCP by (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA17106; Fri, 28 Apr 89 08:26:25 EDT
Received: by novavax.UUCP (smail2.5)
id AA02527; 28 Apr 89 08:00:08 EDT (Fri)
Received: by hcx1.SSD.HARRIS.COM (smail2.5)
id AA01048; 28 Apr 89 05:17:37 EDT (Fri)
Received: from mimsy.UUCP by uunet.uu.net (5.61/1.14) with UUCP
id AA08602; Fri, 28 Apr 89 01:17:19 -0400
Received: by mimsy.UMD.EDU (smail2.5)
id AA21015; 28 Apr 89 01:13:44 EDT (Fri)
Received: by ames.arc.nasa.gov (5.61/1.2); Thu, 27 Apr 89 21:30:45 -0700
Received: by mailrus.cc.umich.edu (5.59/1.0)
id AA13299; Fri, 28 Apr 89 00:30:08 EDT
Received: from e.ms.uky.edu by g.ms.uky.edu id aa14463; 28 Apr 89 4:24 GMT
Received: from s.ms.uky.edu by g.ms.uky.edu id aa03851; 28 Apr 89 4:23 GMT
Received: from g.ms.uky.edu by s.ms.uky.edu id bd25224; 28 Apr 89 4:22 GMT
Received: from tut.cis.ohio-state.edu by g.ms.uky.edu id aa11057;
28 Apr 89 1:35 GMT
Received: from mailrus.cc.umich.edu by tut.cis.ohio-state.edu (5.59/3.890421)
id AA28537; Thu, 27 Apr 89 21:34:38 EDT
Received: by mailrus.cc.umich.edu (5.59/1.0)
id AA11065; Thu, 27 Apr 89 21:38:19 EDT
Received: by b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us (smail2.5)
id AA07827; 27 Apr 89 17:50:43 EST (Thu)
Received: by m-net.ann-arbor.mi.us (smail2.5)
id AA02171; 27 Apr 89 03:40:39 PST (Thu)
Received: by m2-net.uucp (smail2.5)
id AA04247; 27 Apr 89 07:38:50 EST (Thu)
To: mailrus!b-tech.uucp!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!uflorida!novavax!twwells!comparc
Subject: Re: SIMTEL20
Newsgroups: comp.archives
In-Reply-To: <8904171729.AA17731@uxf.cso.uiuc.edu>
Organization: M-NET, Ann Arbor, MI
Cc:
Message-Id: <8904270738.AA04247@m2-net.uucp>
Date: 27 Apr 89 07:38:50 EST (Thu)
From: Bill Luitje <proxftl!uunet!ames!mailrus!m2-net.uucp!luitje>
Simtel20 is a Decsystem 20 with 36 bit words. Image mode transfers thus
leave a garbage nibble in every fourth byte when received by an 8 bit byte
machine. If this sounds like what is happenning to you try
type L 8
instead of type i.