dewey@sequoia.UUCP (Dewey Henize) (09/27/89)
It appears there's some conflict with our sites name somewhere in domanin
(oops, domain) ssc.gov. Course, I'm not sure, reading these things still
makes my head feel funny after a while. I haven't been able, for some
reason, to get mail to where I thought this came from though. I do know
that all the %'s look a bit funky.
------ begin included files -----
From uunet!uiucuxc!SSCVX1.SSC.GOV!Postmaster Mon Sep 25 21:06:50 1989
Received: from execu.execu.com by cedar.execu.uucp (4.0/ESC-Ease) id AA01265; Mon, 25 Sep 89 21:06:47 CDT
Return-Path: <uunet!uiucuxc!SSCVX1.SSC.GOV!Postmaster>
Received: from sequoia.execu.uucp by execu.execu.com (4.0/SMI-4.0.ESC)
id AA17813; Mon, 25 Sep 89 21:06:42 CDT
Received: from execu.execu.com (execu) by sequoia.execu.uucp (4.12/Execucom.hack)
id AA05402; Mon, 25 Sep 89 21:06:39 cdt
Received: from uunet.UUCP by execu.execu.com (4.0/SMI-4.0.ESC)
id AA17810; Mon, 25 Sep 89 21:06:38 CDT
From: uunet!uiucuxc!SSCVX1.SSC.GOV!Postmaster
Received: from uiucuxc.UUCP by uunet.uu.net (5.61/1.14) with UUCP
id AA08482; Mon, 25 Sep 89 20:10:09 -0400
Received: from [134.3.1.101] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA24735; Mon, 25 Sep 89 19:03:08 -0500
Message-Id: <8909260003.AA24735@uxc.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1989 18:58:00 CDT
Subject: Undeliverable Mail
To: <uiucuxc!sequoia!Mailer-Daemon>
Comment: Bad address -- <DMR%Jnet%SLACVM.dnet>
Comment: %MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '%SLACVM.DNET'
Status: OR
Start of returned message
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sscvx1.ssc.gov with SMTP;
Mon, 25 Sep 1989 18:57:46 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA24682; Mon, 25 Sep 89 19:02:33 -0500
Received: by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AB00686; Mon, 25 Sep 89 20:26:42 CDT
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 89 20:26:42 CDT
From: sequoia!Mailer-Daemon@uxc.cso.uiuc.edu (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable
Message-Id: <8909260126.AB00686@sequoia.gov>
To: <"Jnet%SLACVM::DMR"@SSCVX1.SSC.gov>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
Connected to mailhost:
>>> DATA
<<< 554 sendall: too many hops (17 max)
554 <GARAVAG@SEQUOIA.SSC.gov>... Service unavailable
----- Unsent message follows -----
Return-Path: <"Jnet%SLACVM::DMR"@SSCVX1.SSC.gov>
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00684; Mon, 25 Sep 89 20:26:42 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA24627; Mon, 25 Sep 89 19:01:46 -0500
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00681; Mon, 25 Sep 89 20:26:07 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA24593; Mon, 25 Sep 89 19:01:11 -0500
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00678; Mon, 25 Sep 89 20:23:01 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA24525; Mon, 25 Sep 89 18:58:13 -0500
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00675; Mon, 25 Sep 89 20:22:42 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23799; Mon, 25 Sep 89 18:27:44 -0500
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00671; Mon, 25 Sep 89 19:52:11 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23786; Mon, 25 Sep 89 18:27:16 -0500
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00668; Mon, 25 Sep 89 19:51:34 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23770; Mon, 25 Sep 89 18:26:46 -0500
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00665; Mon, 25 Sep 89 19:51:04 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23752; Mon, 25 Sep 89 18:26:00 -0500
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00662; Mon, 25 Sep 89 19:50:12 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23734; Mon, 25 Sep 89 18:25:12 -0500
Received: from SSCVX1.SSC.GOV by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00659; Mon, 25 Sep 89 19:49:33 CDT
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1989 18:19:54 CDT
From: "Jnet%SLACVM::DMR"@SSCVX1.SSC.gov
Message-Id: <890925181954.2020021d@SSCVX1.SSC.GOV>
To: GARAVAG@SEQUOIA.SSC.gov
X-Vmsmail-To: CHAO at SSCVX1, STIENING at SSCVX1, YAN at SSCVX1, EDWARDS at SSCVX1 GIB at SSCVX1, GARAVAGL at SSCVX1, TALMAN at SSCVX1, KEN at SSCVX1
Received: From SLACVM(DMR) by SSCVX1 with Jnet id 3476
for GARAVAGLIA@SSCVX1; Mon, 25 Sep 89 18:19 CDT
Date: 25 September 1989, 10:32:54 PST
From: DMR at SLACVM
To: CHAO at SSCVX1, STIENING at SSCVX1, YAN at SSCVX1, EDWARDS at SSCVX1
GIB at SSCVX1, GARAVAGL at SSCVX1, TALMAN at SSCVX1, KEN at SSCVX1
Subject:
Please let me know if spelling is right of names "gib" "garavagl".
Now that Keith has the SUN running he expects to get things pretty much
tidied up this week.
Please confirm what you want of me (particularly Ray).
I reran on b4 systematic sensitivities at .265,.285 90 deg phase advance.
(Ray). 2 seeds out of 6 have substantial
cross coupling. I am faxing results for one seed (seed 1) with
heavy crosscoupling. It is b4 momentum correlated, (a3 is marginal). It
is not a coding problem (or if it is it is very subtle.)
b4 is reduced in run #9 by changing the
systematic value of b4 (not using the routine to
average b4 to zero). Neither is
the crosscoupling caused by feeddown coding as setting the orbit
displacement to zero does not eliminate it. It is momentum
dependent.It looks like a "cocktail mix" of effects where
crosscoupling leads to momentum dispersion in the vertical causing
b4 systematic to induce further momentum dispersion and so on and
so on. I look forward to your reaction to the above?
With .160 ,.220
and 95 deg phase advance the crosscoupling is small.
I probably should have emphasized more strongly that concatenating
multipole errors to 160 elements gives very closely the same results
as concatenating to 800 elements.
I looked up Ytons early run and it used avdec=.true. I have never
had two different results from the same input and this is not,
emphasize not, an example of such a contradiction.(The code was
checked with IBM memory
load options to ensure there were no initialization
problems.)
Dave
End of returned message
From uunet!uiucuxc!sequoia!Mailer-Daemon Tue Sep 26 12:49:40 1989
Received: from execu.execu.com by cedar.execu.uucp (4.0/ESC-Ease) id AA01949; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:49:37 CDT
Return-Path: <uunet!uiucuxc!sequoia!Mailer-Daemon>
Received: from sequoia.execu.uucp by execu.execu.com (4.0/SMI-4.0.ESC)
id AA27041; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:47:03 CDT
Received: from execu.execu.com (execu) by sequoia.execu.uucp (4.12/Execucom.hack)
id AA24022; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:47:01 cdt
Received: from uunet.UUCP by execu.execu.com (4.0/SMI-4.0.ESC)
id AA27019; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:46:58 CDT
Received: from uiucuxc.UUCP by uunet.uu.net (5.61/1.14) with UUCP
id AA20962; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:43:35 -0400
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23757; Tue, 26 Sep 89 11:34:20 -0500
Received: by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AB00908; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:58:34 CDT
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:58:34 CDT
From: uunet!uiucuxc!sequoia!Mailer-Daemon (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable
Message-Id: <8909261758.AB00908@sequoia.gov>
To: <uiucuxc!sequoia!Mailer-Daemon>
Status: OR
----- Transcript of session follows -----
Connected to mailhost:
>>> DATA
<<< 554 sendall: too many hops (17 max)
554 <GARAVAG@SEQUOIA.SSC.gov>... Service unavailable
----- Unsent message follows -----
Return-Path: <@uxc.cso.uiuc.edu:Mailer-Daemon@sequoia.UUCP>
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00906; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:58:34 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23738; Tue, 26 Sep 89 11:33:40 -0500
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00903; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:57:51 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23693; Tue, 26 Sep 89 11:32:52 -0500
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00900; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:57:18 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23681; Tue, 26 Sep 89 11:32:29 -0500
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00897; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:56:46 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23643; Tue, 26 Sep 89 11:31:49 -0500
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00894; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:56:15 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23621; Tue, 26 Sep 89 11:31:29 -0500
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00891; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:55:53 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23601; Tue, 26 Sep 89 11:31:02 -0500
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00888; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:55:30 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23582; Tue, 26 Sep 89 11:30:19 -0500
Received: from uxc.cso.uiuc.edu by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00885; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:54:42 CDT
Received: from [134.3.2.4] by uxc.cso.uiuc.edu with SMTP
(5.61+/IDA-1.2.8) id AA23560; Tue, 26 Sep 89 11:29:46 -0500
Received: from SSCVX1.SSC.GOV by sequoia.gov (4.0/SMI-4.0)
id AA00882; Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:54:19 CDT
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 89 12:52:07 CDT
From: sequoia!Mailer-Daemon@uxc.cso.uiuc.edu (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable
Message-Id: <8909261752.AB00875@sequoia.gov>
To: <GARAVAGLIA@SSCVX1.SSC.gov>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
Connected to mailhost:
>>> DATA
<<< 554 sendall: too many hops (17 max)
554 <GARAVAG@SEQUOIA.SSC.gov>... Service unavailable
----- Unsent message follows -----
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1989 11:20:18 CDT
From: GARAVAGLIA@SSCVX1.SSC.gov
Message-Id: <890926112018.2020187a@SSCVX1.SSC.GOV>
Subject: TEST OF MAIL
To: GARAVAG@SEQUOIA.SSC.gov
X-Vmsmail-To: GARAVAGLIA
THIS IS A TEST OF MAIL
EXIT
--
| ...!cs.utexas.edu!execu!dewey or | "If you will just quit shouting at me, I |
| ...uunet!execu!dewey | will try to hear what you are saying" |
| Execucom and I often have different ideas. THESE are mine, ok? Ok. |