[comp.mail.uucp] smail 3.x or sendmail?

ap542@ztivax.UUCP (Helmut Peisl) (05/07/90)

In article <231@dynasys.UUCP> jessea@dynasys.UUCP () writes:
>I have heard some mention that they had completely replaced sendmail
>with smail 3.x.  Is smail 3.x a complete replacement for sendmail and
>why would I continue to run sendmail if smail 3.x is so much better?
>Thanx in advance for enlightening me on this.

I'd be grateful, if the responses were posted.
I'm facing replacing a buggy sendmail, to which I have no source,
with smail 3.x. Should I do it?

Thanks
Mike
-- 
Mike Hoffmann, Dept DI AP 542
Siemens AG, Munich, West Germany
Disclaimer: none required in Germany, I think/hope/was told by my lawyer