mark@cogent.UUCP (Captain Neptune) (03/19/87)
Upon compiling emacs 3.8b under HP-UX, which seems to be a pretty good Sys5 port, I get the following unresolved symbols: /bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols: sysint (code) mlreplyt (code) get1key (code) scwrite (code) ctoec (code) tgetc (code) agetc (code) mlreply (code) getname (code) term (data) mlyesno (code) ectoc (code) getstring (code) aputc (code) getcmd (code) Would these be BSD calls? Would I have suitable substitutes under Sys5? Help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. -- +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Mark Steven Jeghers ECHOMPGULP - process has eaten it | | cryptography, terrorist, DES, drugs, cipher, secret, decode, NSA, CIA, NRO | | | | {ihnp4,cbosgd,lll-lcc,lll-crg}|{dual,ptsfa}!cogent!mark | | | | Cogent Software Solutions can not be held responsible for anything said | | by the above person since they have no control over him in the first place | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
berri@aero.UUCP (03/20/87)
As distributed, the Makefile for MicroEmacs 3.8b does not compile or link in the file input.c. This file contains the code for most of the missing symbols. -- Jason
jsa@tut.UUCP (03/20/87)
in article <179@cogent.UUCP>, mark@cogent.UUCP (Captain Neptune) says: > > Upon compiling emacs 3.8b under HP-UX, which seems to be a pretty good > Sys5 port, I get the following unresolved symbols: > > /bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols: > sysint (code) mlreplyt (code) > get1key (code) scwrite (code) > ctoec (code) tgetc (code) > agetc (code) mlreply (code) > getname (code) term (data) > mlyesno (code) ectoc (code) > getstring (code) aputc (code) > getcmd (code) > > Would these be BSD calls? Would I have suitable substitutes under Sys5? > Help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. The above mentioned are NOT any specific BSD -calls. You can fix this by adding input.c to your Makefile. It seemed to be missing from there, and all the functions above are in input.c . Then an other thing : I am currently using IBM PC/AT with MicroPort's UNIX System V release 2. I did compile uEmacs allright. But it seems that the console key mappings don't work. All I can get out of the arrow-keys is h's l's j's and k's as if the console was ment to be used ONLY with vi !! The keyset command does not allow the keypad keys to be configured again. Does anyone happen to know how to make uEmacs work right in this case ??? -- Jari Salo Tampere University of Technology / Computer Syst Lab UUCP: mcvax!tut!jsa PO box 527 SF-33101 Tampere :All rights reversed. This message may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval :system or transmitted further without the prior permission of the author.
cpc@vaxine.UUCP (03/23/87)
> > Upon compiling emacs 3.8b under HP-UX, which seems to be a pretty good > Sys5 port, I get the following unresolved symbols: > > /bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols: > sysint (code) > mlreplyt (code) > etc... I had the same problem. These routines are in tcap.c, and all the other driver files. I first tried to compile with VT100 set, along with BSD, in the config file estruct.h. Set TERMCAP to 1, all others to zero, and it should almost go away. The routine spal() was missing from tcap.c, it sets the pallet, which does nothing. Copy the same do-nothing routine from ibmpc.c or some other driver, and you should be all set. Famous last words. :-) Good luck, -- -- Chris Cullen UUCP: {ucbvax!allegra,decvax}!encore!vaxine!cpc Automatix, Inc. Phone: 617-667-7900 x2066 1000 Technology Park Dr. Billerica, Mass. 01821