[comp.emacs] Termcap entries

mike@turing.unm.edu (Michael I. Bushnell) (07/06/87)

Does anyone have a good termcap for xterms/xterm?  The one with X does
not accurately express the time for various operations, so that
scrolls are done when repaints would be faster.

					Michael I. Bushnell
					a/k/a Bach II
					mike@turing.UNM.EDU
---
I'm reporting for duty as a modern person.  I want to do
 the Latin Hustle now!
				-- Zippy the Pinhead

jr@LF-SERVER-2.BBN.COM.UUCP (07/07/87)

>> Does anyone have a good termcap for xterms/xterm?  The one with X does
>> not accurately express the time for various operations, so that
>> scrolls are done when repaints would be faster.

Um, to do this, you need to know the "baud" rate of your xterm window,
since the calculations are all based on the speed to send a character
to the "terminal".  With xterm, these concepts are silly, hence the
quotes.  You can set (with stty) the "baud" rate to anything you want;
try playing with it to get the effect you want.  Most systems have to
pick a default for network connections; for xterm "connections" you
should probably set it as fast as possible (and it would still be too
slow).

Since you are running X, why not use the built-in X support in emacs
(oops, you didn't say which emacs.  This applies only to GNU.)?  This
just forgets about the cost computation and sends updates all the
time.  Keeps xterm out of your way, and clears out your workstation's
memory of that largish program to boot.  Works especially nicely when
your emacs is on a different host from your X.

If you still have to modify the termcap, you should just probably
remove the scroll/insert line/delete line capabilities.

/jr

mike@turing.unm.edu (Michael I. Bushnell) (07/07/87)

In article <8707071419.AA01369@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> jr@LF-SERVER-2.BBN.COM (John Robinson) writes:
~~~ Does anyone have a good termcap for xterms/xterm?  The one with X does
~~~ not accurately express the time for various operations, so that
~~~ scrolls are done when repaints would be faster.
~
~Since you are running X, why not use the built-in X support in emacs
~(oops, you didn't say which emacs.  This applies only to GNU.)?  This
~just forgets about the cost computation and sends updates all the
~time.  Keeps xterm out of your way, and clears out your workstation's
~memory of that largish program to boot.  Works especially nicely when
~your emacs is on a different host from your X.
~
Thank you very much.  I finally have an incentive.  You see, when I
first obtained GNUemacs, I found that there were problems with getting
the X features to work.  The problems were with our X installation,
and have now been repaired.  But I have been too lazy to recompile it.




					Michael I. Bushnell
					a/k/a Bach II
					mike@turing.UNM.EDU
---
My haircut is totally traditional!
				-- Zippy the Pinhead