drw@culdev1.UUCP (Dale Worley) (11/13/87)
There's a function "set-process-buffer", but there's no complementary
"get-process-buffer". Is there another way to do this?
I want to set a sentinal on the process "shell", so that when it
finishes, the modification-flag of its buffer can be cleared. This
isn't too hard:
(defun sent (process change)
(if (string-equal change "finished\C-j")
(save-excursion
(set-buffer (get-buffer "*shell*"))
(not-modified))))
(set-process-sentinel (get-process "shell") 'sent)
But, if I have more than one shell, the function "sent" is only given
the process, not the associated buffer, so it can't figure out which
modified flag to clear.
Clearly, I could make up an a-list of processes and buffers, but there
should be an easier way to get the information (name, buffer, state)
associated with a process.
Dale
--
Dale Worley Cullinet Software ARPA: culdev1!drw@eddie.mit.edu
UUCP: ...!seismo!harvard!mit-eddie!culdev1!drw
If you get fed twice a day, how bad can life be?maa@sei.cmu.edu (Mark Ardis) (11/16/87)
The function you want is "process-buffer": process-buffer: Return the buffer PROCESS is associated with. Output from PROCESS is inserted in this buffer unless PROCESS has a filter. -- Mark A. Ardis Software Engineering Institute Carnegie-Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (412) 268-7636 maa@sei.cmu.edu
lewis@rocky.STANFORD.EDU (Bil Lewis) (11/16/87)
Posting-Front-End: GNU Emacs 18.36.1 of Fri Feb 6 1987 on rocky (berkeley-unix) Dale, Could this be what you're after? (process-buffer (get-process "shell")) => #<buffer *shell*> It's true that naming conventions are violated on occaision. I can't say why. -Bil --