[comp.emacs] Wanted: paper comparing editors

lwv@n8emr.UUCP (Larry W. Virden) (02/06/88)

I am really sorry if this starts up a war ...

I am looking for OBJECTIVE, NON-PARTIAL, NON-EMOTIONAL, INTELLIGENT,
LOVING :-) articles comparing various text editor/word processors - 
primarily Unipress Emacs vs GNU Emacs vs vi vs Rand/ISC Ten +/ISC INed
varietys.  I have been on the net a number of years so I have seen the
hysterical discussions - I dont need any more of these.  I also am aware
that there is a cost / availability difference.  What I am wanting is some
kind of best / worst features of each editor - IN ISOLATION.  That is, I
dont care to hear that vi is better than INed because - I would like to hear
that vi has this neat feature that is very useful to do that.  

I would PREFER to get existing documents or pointers to existing books.
Secondarily, I would prefer to get the appropriately written toned articles
(see above for criteria :-) from folks who use a particular editor extensively/
exclusively.  Comments from someone who says "I dont use editor X because
it sucks" etc (you know, the standard flame postings :-)) are not needed.
I can get those about every 3-4 months by reading this group and comp.editors.
Sorry, this site doesnt get comp.editors so I couldnt cross-post there where
this REALLY belongs (I do have read access to it, though).

Anyways, the bottom line is that I really want to STRONGLY urge folks to MAIL
me PRIVATE, PERSONAL, REPLY-like messages - PLEASE DON'T POST YOUR RESPONSES.
If you have a DOCUMENT that you would like to share, perhaps a posting to
comp.doc or comp.doc.techreport (for an abstract) would be appropriate. 
Otherwise, I would rather not be the scapegoat for the latest bandwidth
waster...

Thanks fellow tele-tics....

-- 
Larry W. Virden	 75046,606 (CIS)
674 Falls Place, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068 (614) 864-8817
cbosgd!n8emr!lwv (UUCP) 	cbosgd!n8emr!lwv@PSUVAX1 (BITNET)
We haven't inherited the world from our parents, but borrowed it from our children.