eliot@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Eliot Handelman) (06/02/89)
Here's a matter that I've wondered about. Why not get rid of emacslisp altogether and replace it with a full common lisp? I use emacs for Lisp program development, and I think it's very good: but I really don't see why there should be two separate lisp processes running when there is an obvious possibility for a fully integrated enviroment, which much better communication between the editor and the lisp process. Comments?