[comp.emacs] More on DOS Emacsen

randyo@microsoft.UUCP (Randy Orrison) (11/15/89)

In article <2238@hudson.acc.virginia.edu> wrp@biochsn.acc.Virginia.EDU (William R. Pearson) writes:
| In article <364@mlfarm.UUCP> ron@mlfarm.UUCP (Ronald Florence) writes:
| ]I normally work with Gnu Emacs on a Unix system, but need to use a
| ]laptop for work at libraries and archives. ...
| ] ... It would be terrific if
| ]the editor understood modes for text and C and/or could be programmed
| ]in emacs lisp, but "feel" and key-mapping close to Gnu Emacs is more
| ]important...
| 
| 	You want epsilon, from Lugaru Software, $150 at your local
| programmers discount mail order, $195 from them.  It is better than
| GNU, because it's identical, only faster.

Just to stave off some confustion -- Epsilon is functionally VERY
similary to GNU Emacs, but its programming language is based on C,
instead of Lisp.  It is, however, almost fully programmable (all the
user level commands are written in its language, and the source is
supplied, so you can re-define any command), and of course all keys can
be re-bound.  You can pop up a sub-shell with only a couple k consumed
by the editor, for doing makes (or test running your windows app!).

It is overall a wonderful editor, but it's not identical to GNU emacs,
and it's not necessarily faster (compare, say, GNU emacs on a Cray 2 to
Epsilon on an XT).  If you want emacs for DOS, this is what you want.

If you don't want to spend any money, MicroEmacs is my next
recommendation, though its command set isn't as close to GNU emacs.

    -randy
-- 
Randy C. Orrison -- Just an employee of Microsoft Corp, not a spokesman
uunet!microsoft!randyo	   microsoft!cctb!randy	      randy@cctb.wa.com
 "Here we have a purpose in life.  Good for the blood circulation,
  Good for releasing the tension,  The root of our reincarnations." -KT

kim@spock (Kim Letkeman) (11/16/89)

We use GNU at work. I have not used any emacs at home, but a close
friend has been using uemacs 3.10 for several months. He found it
pretty good until he tried freemacs. He immediately preferred freemacs
because it has fewer annoying differences from gnu.

For what it's worth.


-- 
Kim Letkeman    uunet!mitel!spock!kim