QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK (10/19/90)
The most recent version of Jove I've seen is 4.14 although I've seen no sign of this in comp.sources.* where the most recent is 4.9. MicroEmacs is at 3.10. Development on both appears to have stopped some while ago. Can anyone correct me if my information is wrong please? Thanks. Alan Thew University of Liverpool Computer Laboratory Bitnet/Earn: QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK or QQ11%UK.AC.LIVERPOOL @ UKACRL UUCP : ....!mcsun!ukc!liv!qq11 Voice: +44 51 794 3735 Internet : QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK or QQ11%LIVERPOOL.AC.UK @ NSFNET-RELAY.AC.UK
dan@mdbs.uucp (Daniel Lawrence) (10/22/90)
In article <90292.175836QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK> QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK writes: >The most recent version of Jove I've seen is 4.14 although I've >seen no sign of this in comp.sources.* where the most recent is 4.9. >MicroEmacs is at 3.10. > >Development on both appears to have stopped some while ago. Can anyone >correct me if my information is wrong please? MicroEMACS 3.10 was released a little over a year ago. While my development time for it has slowed, In the last year between my own programming and others sending in code, I now have a good XENIX port, ports to the NEC 9800 series, the Fugitsu FMR series and the IBM 5550 machine, generalized double byte character support, a new curses driver, and a number of minor enhancements. I am working on a new installation program to make it easier for others to install. I expect to release 3.11 before december. Daniel Lawrence voice: (317) 742-5153 arpa: mdbs!dan@ee.ecn.purdue.edu The Programmer's Room Fido: 1:201/10 - (317) 742-5533
jpayne@flam.Eng.Sun.COM (Drummer Boy) (10/23/90)
In article <90292.175836QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK> QQ11@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK writes: >The most recent version of Jove I've seen is 4.14 although I've >seen no sign of this in comp.sources.* where the most recent is 4.9. >MicroEmacs is at 3.10. > >Development on both appears to have stopped some while ago. Can anyone >correct me if my information is wrong please? I can only speak for JOVE. There is currently some cleanup work being done on JOVE, not by me. It may or may not actually ever get done, but if it does, it will be made available. But, yeah, for the most part development has stopped for JOVE. Jonathan Payne