ee@atbull.UUCP (Erwin Eder) (09/05/89)
In article <265@atbull.UUCP> i write: >_The configuration: > 60830,UNIX V.3,16MB > >_The Situation: > 2MB for BUFFERS > 'sync' stops all terminal/system activity for > some seconds ( until buffers are written to > disk ? ) > > 1MB for BUFFERS > no troubles with sync > > ( of course 2MB BUFFERS is preferable, but users > complain about terminals freezing for no obvious > reason ) > >_The question: > Is it normal/ok for sync to freeze terminal activity ? Answers : 1>From: tuvie!dpmizar!lcz (Lee Ziegenhals) 1> 1>I would appreciate any information you have on this problem. I ran into the 1>same thing on a Motorola 68030 system running SystemV/68. Motorola's response 1>was basically (1) set the file hardening switch (which turns the cache into 1>a write-through cache -- at a tremendous performance hit), or (2) use fewer 1>buffers. I don't really consider either of these an acceptable solution. 1> 1>I'm hoping to get more information from the engineers at Motorola, but I'm 1>not holding my breath... 1> 1>-Lee Ziegenhals 2>From: Bruce Funk <tuvie!osiris.cso.uiuc.edu!funk> 2> 2>Please summarize or send copy of responses! (Ok! Done...) I hope there will be more responses in comp.unix.questions plus comp.unix.wizards plus comp.bugs.sys5 ! Followups go to comp.unix.wizards. Please respond by e-mail. I will post a summary if there is enough interest. thanx Erwin Eder -- +---/~~~~\---------------+--------------------------------------------+ | / \ <-- this is | and this uunet!mcvax!tuvie!atbull!ee | | \____/ a tree. | is me --> In-Real-Life Erwin Eder | +-----||-----------------+--------------------------------------------+