dave@fps.com (Dave Smith) (10/04/89)
Has there been any thought given to extending the rwhod protocol so that more than 42 (1024/sizeof whoent (==24)) users on a system will be reported correctly? This limit is entirely too small for today's systems. If I read the sources to rwhod correctly, if I define a new revision of the protocol, rwhod's with different versions of the protocol will discard the packets. Is this correct? Will anyone have a fit (ok, I know _someone_ will have a fit, will anyone _important_ have a fit?) if I arbitrarily define a new revision of the protocol? David L. Smith FPS Computing, San Diego ucsd!celerity!dave or dave@fps.com "Repent, Harlequin!," said the TickTock Man