[net.unix-wizards] BSD vs ULTRIX vs SysV

@CSNET-RELAY.arpa,@tufts.csnet (07/11/86)

I administer the UN*X side of the academic computing facility here at
Tufts University.  I am currently running two VAX 780's under 4.2BSD.
The arrival of 4.3BSD has prompted my management to take a look at alternates
to the BSD UN*X.  They keep returning to the topics: System V,  Ultrix.

I am interested in sources of information which might be useful in
helping them to decide what to do.  Is there a report comparing different
UN*X systems that I might read?  Books?  What are your opinions?

I am interested not only in functional differences,  ie this system call
vs that,  but also in less well defined differences like availability of
knowlegable personnel,  corporate software support and its necessity,  etc.

How would you begin to decide which OS a university should run?
If I receive enough interesting answers,  I'll summarize and post,  as
others will surely be faced with the same sorts of questions from the
same sorts of managers.

Kevin Sullivan
Sr. Systems Programmer
Tufts University
Medford, MA 02155

ARPA: kjs%tufts@CSNET-RELAY
BITNET: kjs@tufts

D0430@PUCC.BITNET.UUCP (07/12/86)

In article <2123@brl-smoke.ARPA>, @CSNET-RELAY.arpa,@tufts.csnet:kjs@tufts.c (kjs) writes:
 
>
>I administer the UN*X side of the academic computing facility here at
>Tufts University.  I am currently running two VAX 780's under 4.2BSD.
>The arrival of 4.3BSD has prompted my management to take a look at alternates
>to the BSD UN*X..........
 
I have an application in which I had to make a lot of kernel modifications
to Ultrix 1.1 on a uvaxII.  The assurance that it was 'identical to 4.2'
was just not so.  DEC has done a lot work in various areas to make it more
robust.  For example: it writes partition tables on disks; the uda driver is
a lot bigger and has much more error correction; it uses 4.3 inode caching.
This latter fact caused two of my students several months of grief as they
tried to install RFS.  They succeeded but the difficulties were caused by these
changes.  I am, however, quite happy with it now.  The modifications to run
on the uvaxII were really cute--lots of brain damage in locore.s but
the drivers and higher level kernel routines are virtually the same for uvaxII
and bigger vaxen.  The source is quite cheap to Universities.  We made no
use of DEC support.  I don't know much about 1.2 or 4.3, but I was pleased
with what I saw in 1.1.

rbj@icst-cmr.arpa (07/16/86)

	I administer the UN*X side of the academic computing facility
	here at Tufts University.  I am currently running two VAX 780's
	under 4.2BSD.  The arrival of 4.3BSD has prompted my management
	to take a look at alternates to the BSD UN*X.  They keep
	returning to the topics: System V,  Ultrix.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it. 4.2 -> 4.3 should provide the
least disruption and the most modern system. Your students are
probably used to source as well. At least they're all UNIX.

	I am interested in sources of information which might be useful
	in helping them to decide what to do.  Is there a report
	comparing different UN*X systems that I might read?  Books?
	What are your opinions?

There is a report comparing an old version of BSD (4.1?) with an
old Version of System V (5.0?) (or is it SYS III?), but obviously
you are interested in something more recent.

	I am interested not only in functional differences,  ie this
	system call vs that,  but also in less well defined differences
	like availability of knowlegable personnel,  corporate software
	support and its necessity,  etc.

With System V, you probably won't be able to send this mail the
same way and will be forced into using UUCP. BSD (and obviously
ULTRIX) will allow you local networking on an ethernet cable,
thereby creating your own version of an ARPAnet, even if you
don't have an IMP.

4.3 has been enhanced quite a bit and is faster.

I find support relatively unnecessary, especially in a University
environment. You should find lots of gurus in Beantown.

	How would you begin to decide which OS a university should
	run?  If I receive enough interesting answers,  I'll summarize
	and post,  as others will surely be faced with the same sorts
	of questions from the same sorts of managers.

I wouldn't give TPC the satisfaction. Switching from BSD to System V
is like jumping from the NFL into the USFL.

	Kevin Sullivan Sr. Systems Programmer
	Tufts University Medford, MA 02155
	ARPA: kjs%tufts@CSNET-RELAY	BITNET: kjs@tufts

Any relation to the Pats owners?

	(Root Boy) Jim Cottrell		<rbj@icst-cmr.arpa>
	Was my SOY LOAF left out in th'RAIN?  It tastes REAL GOOD!!

escott@uci-icsa.arpa (07/18/86)

I think all of this should have gone to info-unix, but a reply is a
reply...

> 	I administer the UN*X side of the academic computing facility
> 	here at Tufts University.  I am currently running two VAX 780's
> 	under 4.2BSD.  The arrival of 4.3BSD has prompted my management
> 	to take a look at alternates to the BSD UN*X.  They keep

You mean, you *have* 4.3BSD and you're thinking of going to something
else?  Or by "arrival" do you mean something like "announcement"?  And
if you *do* have 4.3, I'd like to know how you got it, unless you're a
Beta site, in which case I already know.

By the way, it seems to me that I saw a "copy" (photocopy) of the 4.3
distribution tape at Usenix.  Well, we just called Berkeley and were
told that 4.3 is still "not ready for distribution".  Sigh.


 > 	I am interested not only in functional differences,  ie this
 > 	system call vs that,  but also in less well defined differences
 > 	like availability of knowlegable personnel,  corporate software
 > 	support and its necessity,  etc.
 > 
 > I find support relatively unnecessary, especially in a University
 > environment. You should find lots of gurus in Beantown.

 Beantown!?  

 > 
 > 	How would you begin to decide which OS a university should
 > 	run?  If I receive enough interesting answers,  I'll summarize
 > 	and post,  as others will surely be faced with the same sorts
 > 	of questions from the same sorts of managers.
 > 

 I have an idea, Kevin.  Why don't you get on 128 and drop by Brandeis
 and see what they think?  They've been using UNIX since before I was
 an undergraduate there.  I think you'll find that BSD is the way to
 go in a university environment, for the reasons rbj suggests.  I found
 that each class had a couple of hackers, often roommates, who were willing
 to take on system support.  Heck, we did it for $3.65 an hour at Brandeis!
 And that included cleaning the terminals and vacuuming the labs!!
 > 
 > 	Kevin Sullivan Sr. Systems Programmer
 > 	Tufts University Medford, MA 02155
 > 	ARPA: kjs%tufts@CSNET-RELAY	BITNET: kjs@tufts
 > 
 > Any relation to the Pats owners?

 If so, a few other Brandeis alumni and myself would like to talk to you
 about ruining a little party we had last January !!

 > 
 > 	(Root Boy) Jim Cottrell		<rbj@icst-cmr.arpa>
 > 	Was my SOY LOAF left out in th'RAIN?  It tastes REAL GOOD!!

 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
  E. Scott Menter                           Internet:   escott@ics.uci.edu
  UCI Systems Support Group                 UUCP: ...!ucbvax!ucivax!escott

It was a JOKE!! Get it?? I was receiving messages from DAVID
LETTERMAN!! YOW!!  [zippy quote courtesy of GNU Emacs "yow" in Jim's honor]

 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+

rbj@ICST-CMR.arpa (07/18/86)

	From escott@ICS.UCI.EDU Thu Jul 17 16:00:07 1986
	Received: from ICS.UCI.EDU (ics.uci.edu.ARPA) by icst-cmr.ARPA (4.12/4.7)
		id AA11197; Thu, 17 Jul 86 15:58:57 edt
	Message-Id: <8607171958.AA11197@icst-cmr.ARPA>
	Received: from localhost by ICS.UCI.EDU id a017055; 17 Jul 86 12:53 PDT
	To: Root Boy Jim <rbj@icst-cmr.arpa>
	Cc: kjs <@csnet-relay.arpa,@tufts.CSNET:kjs@tufts.CSNET>,
	        unix-wizards@brl.arpa
	Cc: escott@ICS.UCI.EDU
	Subject: Re: BSD vs ULTRIX vs SysV
	In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 15 Jul 86 17:15:50 edt.
	             <8607152115.AA04743@icst-cmr.ARPA>
	Date: Thu, 17 Jul 86 12:52:00 -0800
	From: Scott Menter <escott@ICS.UCI.EDU>
	
	
	I think all of this should have gone to info-unix, but a reply is a
	reply...

OK, I'll send it there too.
	
	> 	I administer the UN*X side of the academic computing facility
	> 	here at Tufts University.  I am currently running two VAX 780's
	> 	under 4.2BSD.  The arrival of 4.3BSD has prompted my management
	> 	to take a look at alternates to the BSD UN*X.  They keep
	
	You mean, you *have* 4.3BSD and you're thinking of going to something
	else?  Or by "arrival" do you mean something like "announcement"?  And
	if you *do* have 4.3, I'd like to know how you got it, unless you're a
	Beta site, in which case I already know.
	
	By the way, it seems to me that I saw a "copy" (photocopy) of the 4.3
	distribution tape at Usenix.  Well, we just called Berkeley and were
	told that 4.3 is still "not ready for distribution".  Sigh.
	
Well, supposedly it *is* ready for distribution, but we ain't got it neither.
Do any other gummint sites have it either (besides the betas)?
	
	 > I find support relatively unnecessary, especially in a University
	 > environment. You should find lots of gurus in Beantown.
	
	 Beantown!?  

Boston. As in Boston baked beans. Common nickname. Yes, I know that
Tufts is in Sommerville. Been there oncest or twicest.
	
	 > 	How would you begin to decide which OS a university should
	 > 	run?  If I receive enough interesting answers,  I'll summarize
	 > 	and post,  as others will surely be faced with the same sorts
	 > 	of questions from the same sorts of managers.
	
	 I have an idea, Kevin.  Why don't you get on 128 and drop by Brandeis
	 and see what they think?  They've been using UNIX since before I was
	 an undergraduate there.  I think you'll find that BSD is the way to
	 go in a university environment, for the reasons rbj suggests.  I found
	 that each class had a couple of hackers, often roommates, who were
	 willing to take on system support.  Heck, we did it for $3.65 an hour
	 at Brandeis! And that included cleaning the terminals and vacuuming
	 the labs!!

But you didn't do windows, right? :-)

	 > 	Kevin Sullivan Sr. Systems Programmer
	 > 	Tufts University Medford, MA 02155
	 > 	ARPA: kjs%tufts@CSNET-RELAY	BITNET: kjs@tufts
	 > 
	 > Any relation to the Pats owners?
	
	 If so, a few other Brandeis alumni and myself would like to talk to you
	 about ruining a little party we had last January !!

The same fate befell the Cowboys. Sigh.

	 > 	(Root Boy) Jim Cottrell		<rbj@icst-cmr.arpa>
	 > 	Was my SOY LOAF left out in th'RAIN?  It tastes REAL GOOD!!
	
	 +----------------------------------------------------------------+
	  E. Scott Menter                   Internet:   escott@ics.uci.edu
	  UCI Systems Support Group         UUCP: ...!ucbvax!ucivax!escott
	
	It was a JOKE!! Get it?? I was receiving messages from DAVID
	LETTERMAN!! YOW!! 
	[zippy quote courtesy of GNU Emacs "yow" in Jim's honor]
	
	 +----------------------------------------------------------------+

	(Root Boy) Jim Cottrell		<rbj@icst-cmr.arpa>
	Hold the MAYO & pass the COSMIC AWARENESS...
	

ron@BRL.ARPA (Ron Natalie) (07/19/86)

Sommerville?  That hell hole.  Tufts is in MEDFORD!